Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Issue/1933 Create "Migrating" section and move content from Guides #1948

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Apr 12, 2018

Conversation

EugeneHlushko
Copy link
Member

Create "Migrating" section and move content from Guides.
Fixes #1933

---

The following sections describe the major changes from webpack 1 to 2.

T> Note that there were far fewer changes between 2 and 3, so that migration shouldn't be too bad. If you are running into issues, please see [the changelog](https://github.com/webpack/webpack/releases) for details.

W> This content may be moved to the blog post in the near future as version 2 has been out for a while. On top of that, version 3 was recently released and version 4 is on the horizon. As noted above, folks should instead to refer to [the changelog](https://github.com/webpack/webpack/releases) for migrations.
Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I dont think this is relevant anymore

Copy link
Member Author

@EugeneHlushko EugeneHlushko Mar 23, 2018

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Previous T> Note is also leading to https://github.com/webpack/webpack/releases

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Agreed

Copy link
Member

@TheLarkInn TheLarkInn left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks great!

Copy link
Member

@TheLarkInn TheLarkInn left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@EugeneHlushko we should merge this against master instead of next branch. Can you update this PR to reflect that?

@EugeneHlushko EugeneHlushko changed the base branch from next to master March 24, 2018 06:25
@EugeneHlushko
Copy link
Member Author

Thank you, it is now master based @TheLarkInn

---

The following sections describe the major changes from webpack 1 to 2.

T> Note that there were far fewer changes between 2 and 3, so that migration shouldn't be too bad. If you are running into issues, please see [the changelog](https://github.com/webpack/webpack/releases) for details.

W> This content may be moved to the blog post in the near future as version 2 has been out for a while. On top of that, version 3 was recently released and version 4 is on the horizon. As noted above, folks should instead to refer to [the changelog](https://github.com/webpack/webpack/releases) for migrations.
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Take a look at changes done in #1939.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It will be fine, any of these getting into master first and the other gets rebased

@EugeneHlushko
Copy link
Member Author

@TheLarkInn can you re-approve this one been hanging for some time now

@EugeneHlushko
Copy link
Member Author

Hi @montogeek ,
Can u merge this if i rebase and resolve the conflict?

@montogeek
Copy link
Member

@EugeneHlushko sure

@EugeneHlushko
Copy link
Member Author

Failure is known: API rate limit exceeded for 104.154.120.187

Pls finish this one @montogeek

@montogeek
Copy link
Member

@EugeneHlushko Do you have permission to move your branch to this repo?

@EugeneHlushko
Copy link
Member Author

@montogeek yes, makes any sense for the finished PRs? thought to create new ones under main repository but merge older ones as is to reduce mess on my side of things

@montogeek
Copy link
Member

montogeek commented Apr 6, 2018

Was trying to make the build pass, it already did. Pinged @TheLarkInn to approve it

@EugeneHlushko
Copy link
Member Author

Thank you!

antwar.config.js Outdated
@@ -55,7 +55,8 @@ module.exports = {
'code-splitting-css': '/guides/code-splitting',
'code-splitting-libraries': '/guides/code-splitting',
'why-webpack': '/comparison',
'production-build': '/guides/production'
'production-build': '/guides/production',
'migrating': '/migrate/3',
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Indent

@TheLarkInn
Copy link
Member

Approved. Let's get conflicts resolved and good to go!

@EugeneHlushko
Copy link
Member Author

Cool, waiting for build and can merge cc @montogeek

@montogeek montogeek merged commit 57c1d9e into webpack:master Apr 12, 2018
@montogeek
Copy link
Member

Thanks

@EugeneHlushko EugeneHlushko deleted the issue/1933 branch April 12, 2018 08:53
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants