-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 8
Issues: mpi-forum/mpi-issues
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Author
Label
Projects
Milestones
Assignee
Sort
Issues list
Other minor updates
mpi-6
For inclusion in the MPI 5.1 or 6.0 standard
#992
opened Apr 1, 2025 by
wgropp
Document Conventions
mpi-6
For inclusion in the MPI 5.1 or 6.0 standard
#990
opened Mar 31, 2025 by
wgropp
Minor text improvements
mpi-6
For inclusion in the MPI 5.1 or 6.0 standard
#989
opened Mar 31, 2025 by
wgropp
Fixes for code check
editor change
Changes to be made by the document editor
mpi-5.0
For inclusion in the MPI 5.0 standard
#988
opened Mar 29, 2025 by
wgropp
Overly restrictive statement about thread levels
mpi-6
For inclusion in the MPI 5.1 or 6.0 standard
#987
opened Mar 29, 2025 by
wgropp
Wait/test any/some/all leaves out single request case
editor change
Changes to be made by the document editor
mpi-5.0
For inclusion in the MPI 5.0 standard
#985
opened Mar 29, 2025 by
wgropp
Fix misspelled const in example
editor change
Changes to be made by the document editor
mpi-5.0
For inclusion in the MPI 5.0 standard
#984
opened Mar 29, 2025 by
wgropp
Bad index macro use fix
editor change
Changes to be made by the document editor
mpi-5.0
For inclusion in the MPI 5.0 standard
#983
opened Mar 29, 2025 by
wgropp
Fix grammar issues in RC
editor change
Changes to be made by the document editor
mpi-5.0
For inclusion in the MPI 5.0 standard
#982
opened Mar 29, 2025 by
wgropp
Formatting fixes
editor change
Changes to be made by the document editor
mpi-5.0
For inclusion in the MPI 5.0 standard
#981
opened Mar 29, 2025 by
wgropp
Internal mutation of communicator or other MPI objects in relation to C++ const semantics
#980
opened Mar 27, 2025 by
correaa
ABI: Missing keys "mpi_{integer|logical}16_supported"
chap-abi
ABI Chapter Committee
Chapter Committee Change
Changes to be made by the respective chapter committee(s)
mpi-5.0
For inclusion in the MPI 5.0 standard
wg-abi
ABI Working Group
#979
opened Mar 24, 2025 by
dalcinl
need to fix MPI_Type_size return value for unsupported datatypes in the ABI
chap-abi
ABI Chapter Committee
mpi-5.0
For inclusion in the MPI 5.0 standard
Tools Chapter Committee needs update
editor change
Changes to be made by the document editor
mpi-5.0
For inclusion in the MPI 5.0 standard
scheduled no-no vote
No-No vote is scheduled for the next meeting
scheduled reading
Reading is scheduled for the next meeting
kill MPI_Fint from ABI
chap-abi
ABI Chapter Committee
had reading
Completed the formal proposal reading
mpi-5.0
For inclusion in the MPI 5.0 standard
scheduled first-and-only vote
First-and-only vote is scheduled for the next meeting
Do All-to-All collectives *must* synchronize?
chap-collective
Collective Communication Chapter Committee
chap-terms
MPI Terms and Conventions Chapter Committee
mpi-6
For inclusion in the MPI 5.1 or 6.0 standard
#971
opened Mar 5, 2025 by
mknobi
Description of shared file-pointer movement convoluted
chap-io
I/O Chapter Committee
Chapter Committee Change
Changes to be made by the respective chapter committee(s)
#970
opened Mar 5, 2025 by
mahermanns
p. 714, l 20, 40ff: It the only normative text outside of an example environment in this section. This is kind of weird without introductory text to the example
chap-io
I/O Chapter Committee
mpi-6
For inclusion in the MPI 5.1 or 6.0 standard
wg-io
I/O Working Group
#969
opened Mar 5, 2025 by
wesbland
\mpilaunch noch hyperref-enabled
chap-dynamic
Process Initialization, Creation, and Management Chapter Committee
mpi-6
For inclusion in the MPI 5.1 or 6.0 standard
#968
opened Mar 5, 2025 by
mahermanns
pg 528, ln 32 - only mpi_memory_alloc_kinds includes a parenthetical with the value type and default, which looks out of place. perhaps it can be removed, or other keys such as mpi_initial_errhandler can be extended with type and default?"
chap-dynamic
Process Initialization, Creation, and Management Chapter Committee
mpi-6
For inclusion in the MPI 5.1 or 6.0 standard
#967
opened Mar 5, 2025 by
wesbland
"pg 503, ln 20 - comment in example about freeing the group because the library doesn't need it seems out of place. also lib_comm is not used, or at least commented how it might be used.
chap-dynamic
Process Initialization, Creation, and Management Chapter Committee
mpi-6
For inclusion in the MPI 5.1 or 6.0 standard
#966
opened Mar 5, 2025 by
wesbland
Page 68 line 34: is a single bullet-point algorithm for send really a "model implementation"? Do we provide a code example/reference implementation elsewhere?
chap-p2p
Point to Point Communication Chapter Committee
mpi-6
For inclusion in the MPI 5.1 or 6.0 standard
wg-p2p
Point-to-Point Working Group
#965
opened Mar 5, 2025 by
wrwilliams
AtoU page 60-61 border: this reads as a deprecation without a deprecation
chap-p2p
Point to Point Communication Chapter Committee
mpi-6
For inclusion in the MPI 5.1 or 6.0 standard
wg-p2p
Point-to-Point Working Group
#964
opened Mar 5, 2025 by
wrwilliams
Previous Next
ProTip!
Exclude everything labeled
bug
with -label:bug.