Skip to content

Page 68 line 34: is a single bullet-point algorithm for send really a "model implementation"? Do we provide a code example/reference implementation elsewhere? #965

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
Tracked by #911
wrwilliams opened this issue Mar 5, 2025 · 0 comments
Labels
chap-p2p Point to Point Communication Chapter Committee mpi-6 For inclusion in the MPI 5.1 or 6.0 standard wg-p2p Point-to-Point Working Group

Comments

@wrwilliams
Copy link

wrwilliams commented Mar 5, 2025

Section 3.6.1 could either become a code example or be abstracted enough to be an algorithm and in either case fit better with the rest of the document. Is the current level of detail actually what implementers want to refer to?

@wesbland wesbland added wg-p2p Point-to-Point Working Group mpi-6 For inclusion in the MPI 5.1 or 6.0 standard chap-p2p Point to Point Communication Chapter Committee labels Mar 5, 2025
@github-project-automation github-project-automation bot moved this to To Do in MPI Next Mar 5, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
chap-p2p Point to Point Communication Chapter Committee mpi-6 For inclusion in the MPI 5.1 or 6.0 standard wg-p2p Point-to-Point Working Group
Projects
Status: To Do
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants