Skip to content

Conversation

@kkartunov
Copy link
Contributor

Potential fix for https://github.com/topcoder-platform/identity-api-v6/security/code-scanning/13

To fix the vulnerability, the code must validate at the entry point (the controller method or at the very beginning of processing) that handle is a string—and not an array, object, or other type—before using string methods. The best way is:

  • In the validateHandle controller method (user.controller.ts), check if handle is a string. If not, throw a BadRequestException (just like if it were missing), or coerce to string as appropriate.
  • Optionally, add similar checks in ValidationService.validateHandle and/or other service methods that process handle, unless we are sure all entry points are protected by the controller check.

All code paths that depend on handle being a string (especially those that call .length, .charAt, etc.) will then be safe from type confusion by this early validation.

Changes required:

  • In src/api/user/user.controller.ts, in the validateHandle controller method, add a check immediately after receiving the value for handle to ensure it's a string.
  • Throw a BadRequestException if typeof handle !== 'string' or Array.isArray(handle) is true (since arrays will have typeof 'object').
  • No new dependencies are needed, as these checks use built-in JS/TS features.

Suggested fixes powered by Copilot Autofix. Review carefully before merging.

…parameter tampering

Co-authored-by: Copilot Autofix powered by AI <62310815+github-advanced-security[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
if (
!handle ||
typeof handle !== "string" ||
(Array.isArray(handle))

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

[💡 maintainability]
The check Array.isArray(handle) is redundant since typeof handle !== 'string' already covers non-string types, including arrays. Consider removing it for simplicity.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants