Add CiscoSyntax BadWifi package (Alt to existing)

[mburknoe]

• [YES ] I'm the package's author and/or maintainer.
• [YES ] I have have read [the docs][1].
• [ YES, though it's the first] I have tagged a release with a [semver][2] version number.
• [ YES] My package repo has a description and a README describing what it's for and how to use it.
• [ YES] My package doesn't add context menu entries. *
• [ YES] My package doesn't add key bindings. **
• [N/A] Any commands are available via the command palette.
• [N/A] Preferences and keybindings (if any) are listed in the menu and the command palette, and open in split view.
• [ TRUE ] If my package is a syntax it doesn't also add a color scheme. ***
• [ DONE IN PATCH 1.0.1, I didn't know this was a thing! thx.] I use [.gitattributes][3] to exclude files from the package: images, test files, sublime-project/workspace.

My package is an alternative to the existing "Cisco Syntax Highlighter". The existing one has not been updated in 7 years, and really doesn't do anything so I have never used it as a CCIE Cisco Engineer and over my career been frustrated by the lack of Cisco Syntax in Sublime

Mine will be active and I'll address recomendations from users.

[braver]

Your repo does not seem to exist at that URL (looks like this might be the one: https://github.com/mburknoe/CiscoSyntax-Badwifi-Sublime-syntax).

[mburknoe]

Yes, you have the right one, Not sure how I made that mistake. I appreciate you fixing it.

Did you think that the proposed name is appropriate or should I name it something else?

[braver]

I think we can actually just replace the existing package and use its name.

[mburknoe]

I like that alot, would you let me to try the pull request again, or do you have it covered?

If we replace the existing one using the same name, what does that do to all of the users that already have the existing one installed?

[braver]

I'll make a PR and let you double check, that'll be quicker.

Your package will have a higher version than the existing one, so all users will be upgraded to your new version.

Ideally, you have a message explaining what happened and linking back to the original package (so that users who want that can still find it and manually install).

[braver]

If that is indeed the correct URL, we could replace the existing entry with yours. If that's ok with @tunnelsup, that would give everyone 1 up to date syntax package for this use case.

[tunnelsup]

Doesn't matter to me. I have no knowledge how popular or used my syntax highlighter is used and it's not maintained anymore.

[braver]

@tunnelsup thanks!

We'll continue in #9267