-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 32
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add platform-support component #326
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
Thank you @petaa33 for your PR. It might take some time to get a feedback on this because we have to discuss internally where the green check should be. |
<div class="secondary check"><i class="fa-solid fa-circle-check"></i></div> | ||
<div class="secondary check"><i class="fa-solid fa-circle-check"></i></div> | ||
|
||
<div class="main">Code only</div> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I would replace word "Code only" with word "Runtime".
That's because Runtime is a wider term and AFAIK code-only is a part of Stride Community toolkit and It's basically one of two flavors of developing game. First is unity-like (default one) in which you visually adding or creating an assets by using GameStudio. This however does not mean that you need GameStudio to run your game.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Maybe good idea would be adding Tooltip that this also includes code only approach (example: https://fluent2.microsoft.design/components/web/react/tooltip/usage/)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I agree that "Code Only" isn't the best term for this, though it is what has been used so far for it. "Runtime" might not be the best either as imo it has more of a connotation of the actual running application (especially true if you look at Unity). Maybe "Framework" would make sense? Generally I see the term used when refering to 'game engines' that don't have a visual editor. So, just the API/code.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Now you see, why this PR might take some time to resolve 🤣🙈
@dotnet-policy-service agree |
Issue
#116
Desktop
Mobile, (scroll x enabled)