-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 32
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
JP-3793: Fix numbers of flagged groups #338
Open
drlaw1558
wants to merge
5
commits into
spacetelescope:main
Choose a base branch
from
drlaw1558:JP-3793
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Changes from 4 commits
Commits
Show all changes
5 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1 @@ | ||
Fix a bug in the jump step with counting the number of usable groups. |
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
|
@@ -22,6 +22,89 @@ | |
|
||
return _cube | ||
|
||
def test_sigclip_not_enough_groups(setup_cube): | ||
ngroups = 10 | ||
data, gdq, nframes, read_noise, rej_threshold = setup_cube(ngroups, nints=8, nrows=2, ncols=2, readnoise=8) | ||
out_gdq, row_below_gdq, rows_above_gdq, total_crs, stddev = find_crs( | ||
data, gdq, read_noise, rej_threshold, rej_threshold, rej_threshold, | ||
nframes, False, 200, 10, DQFLAGS, | ||
minimum_sigclip_groups=10, minimum_groups=5 | ||
) | ||
assert total_crs == -99 | ||
|
||
def test_sigclip_not_enough_groups(setup_cube): | ||
ngroups = 5 | ||
data, gdq, nframes, read_noise, rej_threshold = setup_cube(ngroups, nints=8, nrows=2, ncols=2, readnoise=8) | ||
out_gdq, row_below_gdq, rows_above_gdq, total_crs, stddev = find_crs( | ||
data, gdq, read_noise, rej_threshold, rej_threshold, rej_threshold, | ||
nframes, False, 200, 10, DQFLAGS, | ||
minimum_sigclip_groups=11, minimum_groups=6 | ||
) | ||
assert total_crs == -99 | ||
|
||
def test_sigclip_not_enough_groups(setup_cube): | ||
ngroups = 12 | ||
|
||
data, gdq, nframes, read_noise, rej_threshold = setup_cube(ngroups, nints=8, nrows=2, ncols=2, readnoise=8) | ||
data[0, 0:2, 0:, 0] = 1 | ||
out_gdq, row_below_gdq, rows_above_gdq, total_crs, stddev = find_crs( | ||
data, gdq, read_noise, rej_threshold, rej_threshold, rej_threshold, | ||
nframes, False, 200, 10, DQFLAGS, | ||
minimum_sigclip_groups=11, minimum_groups=16 | ||
) | ||
assert total_crs == -99 | ||
|
||
def test_sigclip_with_num_small_groups(setup_cube): | ||
ngroups = 12 | ||
nints = 190 | ||
|
||
data, gdq, nframes, read_noise, rej_threshold = setup_cube(ngroups, nints=nints, nrows=2, ncols=2, readnoise=8) | ||
data[0, 0:2, 0:, 0] = 1 | ||
out_gdq, row_below_gdq, rows_above_gdq, total_crs, stddev = find_crs( | ||
data, gdq, read_noise, rej_threshold, rej_threshold, rej_threshold, | ||
nframes, False, 200, 10, DQFLAGS, | ||
minimum_sigclip_groups=11, minimum_groups=16 | ||
) | ||
assert total_crs != -99 | ||
|
||
def test_nosigclip_with_enough_groups(setup_cube): | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. This test is also defined again later with the same name, so only the second one runs. Testing locally, it looks like both pass as written. |
||
ngroups = 12 | ||
nints = 1 | ||
|
||
data, gdq, nframes, read_noise, rej_threshold = setup_cube(ngroups, nints=nints, nrows=2, ncols=2, readnoise=8) | ||
data[0, 0:2, 0:, 0] = 1 | ||
out_gdq, row_below_gdq, rows_above_gdq, total_crs, stddev = find_crs( | ||
data, gdq, read_noise, rej_threshold, rej_threshold, rej_threshold, | ||
nframes, False, 200, 10, DQFLAGS, | ||
minimum_sigclip_groups=11, minimum_groups=5 | ||
) | ||
assert total_crs != -99 | ||
|
||
def test_nosigclip_with_num_small_groups(setup_cube): | ||
ngroups = 4 | ||
nints = 1 | ||
|
||
data, gdq, nframes, read_noise, rej_threshold = setup_cube(ngroups, nints=nints, nrows=2, ncols=2, readnoise=8) | ||
data[0, 0:2, 0:, 0] = 1 | ||
out_gdq, row_below_gdq, rows_above_gdq, total_crs, stddev = find_crs( | ||
data, gdq, read_noise, rej_threshold, rej_threshold, rej_threshold, | ||
nframes, False, 200, 10, DQFLAGS, | ||
minimum_sigclip_groups=11, minimum_groups=16 | ||
) | ||
assert total_crs == -99 | ||
|
||
def test_nosigclip_with_num_small_groups(setup_cube): | ||
ngroups = 4 | ||
nints = 100 | ||
|
||
data, gdq, nframes, read_noise, rej_threshold = setup_cube(ngroups, nints=nints, nrows=2, ncols=2, readnoise=8) | ||
data[0, 0:2, 0:, 0] = 1 | ||
out_gdq, row_below_gdq, rows_above_gdq, total_crs, stddev = find_crs( | ||
data, gdq, read_noise, rej_threshold, rej_threshold, rej_threshold, | ||
nframes, False, 200, 10, DQFLAGS, | ||
minimum_sigclip_groups=100, minimum_groups=16 | ||
) | ||
assert total_crs != -99 | ||
|
||
def test_varying_groups(setup_cube): | ||
ngroups = 5 | ||
|
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This test has three different definitions with the same name, so only the last one will be run. Testing locally, it looks like the first one fails and the second two pass, as written.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ah, I thought that was odd but wasn't sure whether same-named tests were ok or not. I've given them unique names now. Looks like that also fixes why I wasn't able to get any pytests against stcal to run locally.
@mwregan2 Any thoughts on why some of these new tests are failing?