Skip to content

Conversation

@istreeter
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@netlify
Copy link

netlify bot commented Oct 28, 2025

Deploy Preview for snowplow-docs ready!

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit 3a75089
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/projects/snowplow-docs/deploys/6900ae5611d64200084f85f4
😎 Deploy Preview https://deploy-preview-1462--snowplow-docs.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile
Toggle QR Code...

QR Code

Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.
Lighthouse
Lighthouse
1 paths audited
Performance: 13 (🔴 down 1 from production)
Accessibility: 91 (no change from production)
Best Practices: 100 (🟢 up 8 from production)
SEO: 95 (no change from production)
PWA: -
View the detailed breakdown and full score reports

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify project configuration.

@istreeter istreeter force-pushed the improve-schemas-in-warehouse branch from 6e7f3df to a4865d1 Compare October 28, 2025 10:16
```

If the `"properties"` key is missing, the type for the entire object will be `STRING` instead of `RECORD`.
If the `"properties"` key is missing, the type for the entire object will be `JSON` instead of `RECORD`.
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I wrote "properties" (in quotes) because that's how was written before this PR. And I extended that pattern elsewhere in this PR for consistency.

I'd happily change it simply properties (no quotes) if you prefer.

@istreeter istreeter requested a review from stanch October 28, 2025 10:18
}
```

If the `"properties"` key is missing, the type for the entire object will be `STRING` instead of `STRUCT`.
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Useful to add that the string is serialized as JSON (here and elsewhere)?

@istreeter
Copy link
Contributor Author

My most recent commit also fixed some mistakes regarding enums in BigQuery and Databricks.

@istreeter istreeter requested a review from stanch October 29, 2025 09:43
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants