-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.7k
[release-4.19] OCPBUGS-56662: Fix failed etcd test on arbiter ci run #29826
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[release-4.19] OCPBUGS-56662: Fix failed etcd test on arbiter ci run #29826
Conversation
Signed-off-by: nhamza <[email protected]>
@openshift-cherrypick-robot: Ignoring requests to cherry-pick non-bug issues: OCPEDGE-1678 In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
/retitle [release-4.19] OCPEDGE-1894: Fix failed etcd test on arbiter ci run |
@openshift-cherrypick-robot: This pull request references OCPEDGE-1894 which is a valid jira issue. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
/lgtm |
/test e2e-metal-ovn-two-node-arbiter |
/assign @dusk125 Hey Allen, when you get a chance can you approve this backport. This is the last test to going green on our ci lanes :) https://prow.ci.openshift.org/view/gs/test-platform-results/pr-logs/pull/openshift_release/65116/rehearse-65116-periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-nightly-4.19-e2e-metal-ovn-two-node-arbiter-techpreview/1924666446495879168 |
/approve |
@dusk125: Can not set label backport-risk-assessed: Must be member in one of these teams: [openshift-staff-engineers] In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: dusk125, eggfoobar, openshift-cherrypick-robot The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
@openshift-cherrypick-robot: The following tests failed, say
Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here. |
/label qe-approved |
@openshift-cherrypick-robot: This pull request references OCPEDGE-1894 which is a valid jira issue. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
/label backport-risk-assessed |
@hasbro17: Can not set label backport-risk-assessed: Must be member in one of these teams: [openshift-staff-engineers] In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
/assign @sjenning |
/label backport-risk-assessed |
/label cherry-pick-approved |
/retitle [release-4.19] OCPBUGS-56662: Fix failed etcd test on arbiter ci run |
@openshift-cherrypick-robot: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-56662, which is invalid:
Comment The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
/jira refresh Making the bot happy :) |
@eggfoobar: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-56662, which is invalid:
Comment In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
/jira refresh |
@eggfoobar: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-56662, which is valid. 7 validation(s) were run on this bug
In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
1 similar comment
@eggfoobar: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-56662, which is valid. 7 validation(s) were run on this bug
In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
828598b
into
openshift:release-4.19
@openshift-cherrypick-robot: Jira Issue OCPBUGS-56662: All pull requests linked via external trackers have merged: Jira Issue OCPBUGS-56662 has been moved to the MODIFIED state. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
[ART PR BUILD NOTIFIER] Distgit: openshift-enterprise-tests |
Fix included in accepted release 4.19.0-0.nightly-2025-05-27-102921 |
This is an automated cherry-pick of #29694
/assign eggfoobar