CNTRLPLANE-1: Update etcd test data for 1.32 release #29376

bertinatto · 2024-12-13T18:51:40Z

This is intended to fix:

https://prow.ci.openshift.org/view/gs/test-platform-results/logs/openshift-kubernetes-2147-ci-4.19-e2e-aws-ovn-techpreview-serial/1867506662982553600

[sig-api-machinery] API data in etcd should be stored at the correct location and version for all resources [Serial] [Suite:openshift/conformance/serial] expand_less 	15s
{  fail [github.com/openshift/origin/test/extended/etcd/etcd_storage_path.go:482]: test failed:
no test data for resource.k8s.io/v1beta1, Kind=DeviceClass.  Please add a test for your new type to etcdStorageData.
no test data for resource.k8s.io/v1beta1, Kind=ResourceClaim.  Please add a test for your new type to etcdStorageData.
no test data for resource.k8s.io/v1beta1, Kind=ResourceClaimTemplate.  Please add a test for your new type to etcdStorageData.
no test data for resource.k8s.io/v1beta1, Kind=ResourceSlice.  Please add a test for your new type to etcdStorageData.
GVK for resource.k8s.io/v1alpha3, Kind=DeviceClass does not match, expected resource.k8s.io/v1alpha3, Kind=DeviceClass got resource.k8s.io/v1beta1, Kind=DeviceClass
GVK for resource.k8s.io/v1alpha3, Kind=ResourceClaim does not match, expected resource.k8s.io/v1alpha3, Kind=ResourceClaim got resource.k8s.io/v1beta1, Kind=ResourceClaim
GVK for resource.k8s.io/v1alpha3, Kind=ResourceClaimTemplate does not match, expected resource.k8s.io/v1alpha3, Kind=ResourceClaimTemplate got resource.k8s.io/v1beta1, Kind=ResourceClaimTemplate
GVK for resource.k8s.io/v1alpha3, Kind=ResourceSlice does not match, expected resource.k8s.io/v1alpha3, Kind=ResourceSlice got resource.k8s.io/v1beta1, Kind=ResourceSlice
etcd data does not match the types we saw:
seen but not in etcd data:
[
	resource.k8s.io/v1beta1, Resource=resourceslices 
	resource.k8s.io/v1beta1, Resource=resourceclaims 
	resource.k8s.io/v1beta1, Resource=resourceclaimtemplates 
	resource.k8s.io/v1beta1, Resource=deviceclasses]
Ginkgo exit error 1: exit with code 1}

/assign @dusk125

openshift-ci-robot · 2024-12-13T18:51:44Z

@bertinatto: This pull request references CNTRLPLANE-1 which is a valid jira issue.

Warning: The referenced jira issue has an invalid target version for the target branch this PR targets: expected the epic to target the "4.19.0" version, but no target version was set.

In response to this:

/assign @dusk125

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

openshift-ci-robot · 2024-12-13T18:52:46Z

@bertinatto: This pull request references CNTRLPLANE-1 which is a valid jira issue.

Warning: The referenced jira issue has an invalid target version for the target branch this PR targets: expected the epic to target the "4.19.0" version, but no target version was set.

In response to this:

This is intended to fix:

https://prow.ci.openshift.org/view/gs/test-platform-results/logs/openshift-kubernetes-2147-ci-4.19-e2e-aws-ovn-techpreview-serial/1867506662982553600

[sig-api-machinery] API data in etcd should be stored at the correct location and version for all resources [Serial] [Suite:openshift/conformance/serial] expand_less 	15s
{  fail [github.com/openshift/origin/test/extended/etcd/etcd_storage_path.go:482]: test failed:
no test data for resource.k8s.io/v1beta1, Kind=DeviceClass.  Please add a test for your new type to etcdStorageData.
no test data for resource.k8s.io/v1beta1, Kind=ResourceClaim.  Please add a test for your new type to etcdStorageData.
no test data for resource.k8s.io/v1beta1, Kind=ResourceClaimTemplate.  Please add a test for your new type to etcdStorageData.
no test data for resource.k8s.io/v1beta1, Kind=ResourceSlice.  Please add a test for your new type to etcdStorageData.
GVK for resource.k8s.io/v1alpha3, Kind=DeviceClass does not match, expected resource.k8s.io/v1alpha3, Kind=DeviceClass got resource.k8s.io/v1beta1, Kind=DeviceClass
GVK for resource.k8s.io/v1alpha3, Kind=ResourceClaim does not match, expected resource.k8s.io/v1alpha3, Kind=ResourceClaim got resource.k8s.io/v1beta1, Kind=ResourceClaim
GVK for resource.k8s.io/v1alpha3, Kind=ResourceClaimTemplate does not match, expected resource.k8s.io/v1alpha3, Kind=ResourceClaimTemplate got resource.k8s.io/v1beta1, Kind=ResourceClaimTemplate
GVK for resource.k8s.io/v1alpha3, Kind=ResourceSlice does not match, expected resource.k8s.io/v1alpha3, Kind=ResourceSlice got resource.k8s.io/v1beta1, Kind=ResourceSlice
etcd data does not match the types we saw:
seen but not in etcd data:
[
  resource.k8s.io/v1beta1, Resource=resourceslices 
  resource.k8s.io/v1beta1, Resource=resourceclaims 
  resource.k8s.io/v1beta1, Resource=resourceclaimtemplates 
  resource.k8s.io/v1beta1, Resource=deviceclasses]
Ginkgo exit error 1: exit with code 1}

/assign @dusk125

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

dusk125 · 2024-12-13T18:55:04Z

/lgtm

bertinatto · 2024-12-13T21:32:33Z

/payload-job-with-prs periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-ci-4.19-e2e-aws-ovn-techpreview-serial openshift/kubernetes#2147

openshift-ci · 2024-12-13T21:32:36Z

@bertinatto: trigger 1 job(s) for the /payload-(with-prs|job|aggregate|job-with-prs|aggregate-with-prs) command

periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-ci-4.19-e2e-aws-ovn-techpreview-serial

See details on https://pr-payload-tests.ci.openshift.org/runs/ci/c3bbbbd0-b999-11ef-8485-4df525008c08-0

bertinatto · 2024-12-13T21:33:57Z

/retest-required

openshift-trt · 2024-12-13T23:39:26Z

Job Failure Risk Analysis for sha: b74a53b

Job Name	Failure Risk
pull-ci-openshift-origin-master-e2e-aws-ovn-edge-zones	High [sig-instrumentation] Prometheus [apigroup:image.openshift.io] when installed on the cluster shouldn't report any alerts in firing state apart from Watchdog and AlertmanagerReceiversNotConfigured [Early][apigroup:config.openshift.io] [Skipped:Disconnected] [Suite:openshift/conformance/parallel] This test has passed 99.24% of 132 runs on release 4.19 [Architecture:amd64 FeatureSet:default Installer:ipi Network:ovn NetworkStack:ipv4 Platform:aws SecurityMode:default Topology:ha Upgrade:none] in the last week.

openshift-ci-robot · 2024-12-14T00:10:51Z

/retest-required

Remaining retests: 0 against base HEAD b7c61a7 and 2 for PR HEAD b74a53b in total

bertinatto · 2024-12-14T01:32:29Z

/payload-job-with-prs periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-ci-4.19-e2e-aws-ovn-techpreview-serial openshift/kubernetes#2147

openshift-ci · 2024-12-14T01:32:33Z

@bertinatto: trigger 1 job(s) for the /payload-(with-prs|job|aggregate|job-with-prs|aggregate-with-prs) command

periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-ci-4.19-e2e-aws-ovn-techpreview-serial

See details on https://pr-payload-tests.ci.openshift.org/runs/ci/487cdc20-b9bb-11ef-8f3b-2dffa7abea46-0

openshift-trt · 2024-12-14T07:18:11Z

Job Failure Risk Analysis for sha: 48ebd00

Job Name	Failure Risk
pull-ci-openshift-origin-master-okd-scos-e2e-aws-ovn	IncompleteTests Tests for this run (20) are below the historical average (857): IncompleteTests (not enough tests ran to make a reasonable risk analysis; this could be due to infra, installation, or upgrade problems)

bertinatto · 2024-12-16T14:06:48Z

/payload-job-with-prs periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-ci-4.19-e2e-aws-ovn-techpreview-serial openshift/kubernetes#2148

openshift-ci · 2024-12-16T14:06:53Z

@bertinatto: trigger 1 job(s) for the /payload-(with-prs|job|aggregate|job-with-prs|aggregate-with-prs) command

periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-ci-4.19-e2e-aws-ovn-techpreview-serial

See details on https://pr-payload-tests.ci.openshift.org/runs/ci/fe05a700-bbb6-11ef-8d9f-5aaf54f0d888-0

bertinatto · 2024-12-16T14:07:58Z

/payload-job periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-nightly-4.19-e2e-vsphere-ovn-techpreview-serial

openshift-ci · 2024-12-16T14:08:12Z

@bertinatto: trigger 1 job(s) for the /payload-(with-prs|job|aggregate|job-with-prs|aggregate-with-prs) command

periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-nightly-4.19-e2e-vsphere-ovn-techpreview-serial

See details on https://pr-payload-tests.ci.openshift.org/runs/ci/28397c40-bbb7-11ef-8bd1-91dd0c014825-0

dusk125

/lgtm

openshift-ci · 2024-12-16T16:11:06Z

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: bertinatto, dusk125

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

~~test/extended/etcd/OWNERS~~ [bertinatto,dusk125]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

bertinatto · 2024-12-16T17:20:30Z

/retest-required

bertinatto · 2024-12-16T18:49:28Z

/retest-required

bertinatto · 2024-12-16T20:02:18Z

/retest-required

bertinatto · 2024-12-16T20:35:08Z

/retest-required

bertinatto · 2024-12-16T22:54:46Z

/retest-required

dusk125 · 2024-12-17T00:28:15Z

/retest-required

bertinatto · 2024-12-17T11:03:24Z

/retest-required

bertinatto · 2024-12-17T11:37:25Z

/retest-required

bertinatto · 2024-12-17T12:19:48Z

/retest-required

openshift-ci-robot · 2024-12-17T13:27:04Z

/retest-required

Remaining retests: 0 against base HEAD b7c61a7 and 2 for PR HEAD e2e4101 in total

bertinatto · 2024-12-17T15:06:59Z

/retest-required

bertinatto · 2024-12-17T15:59:22Z

/retest-required

openshift-ci · 2024-12-17T19:08:46Z

@bertinatto: The following tests failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name	Commit	Details	Required	Rerun command
ci/prow/e2e-agnostic-ovn-cmd	`e2e4101`	link	false	`/test e2e-agnostic-ovn-cmd`
ci/prow/okd-scos-e2e-aws-ovn	`e2e4101`	link	false	`/test okd-scos-e2e-aws-ovn`
ci/prow/e2e-aws-ovn-single-node-serial	`e2e4101`	link	false	`/test e2e-aws-ovn-single-node-serial`
ci/prow/e2e-aws-ovn-kube-apiserver-rollout	`e2e4101`	link	false	`/test e2e-aws-ovn-kube-apiserver-rollout`
ci/prow/e2e-aws-ovn-single-node-upgrade	`e2e4101`	link	false	`/test e2e-aws-ovn-single-node-upgrade`
ci/prow/e2e-gcp-csi	`e2e4101`	link	false	`/test e2e-gcp-csi`
ci/prow/e2e-openstack-ovn	`e2e4101`	link	false	`/test e2e-openstack-ovn`
ci/prow/e2e-gcp-ovn-rt-upgrade	`e2e4101`	link	false	`/test e2e-gcp-ovn-rt-upgrade`

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

bertinatto · 2024-12-17T19:39:14Z

/retest-required

openshift-trt · 2024-12-17T20:22:50Z

Job Failure Risk Analysis for sha: e2e4101

Job Name	Failure Risk
pull-ci-openshift-origin-master-okd-scos-e2e-aws-ovn	IncompleteTests Tests for this run (20) are below the historical average (561): IncompleteTests (not enough tests ran to make a reasonable risk analysis; this could be due to infra, installation, or upgrade problems)

openshift-trt · 2024-12-17T21:29:46Z

Job Failure Risk Analysis for sha: e2e4101

Job Name	Failure Risk
pull-ci-openshift-origin-master-okd-scos-e2e-aws-ovn	IncompleteTests Tests for this run (20) are below the historical average (561): IncompleteTests (not enough tests ran to make a reasonable risk analysis; this could be due to infra, installation, or upgrade problems)

bertinatto · 2024-12-17T22:45:25Z

/retest-required

openshift-bot · 2024-12-18T05:02:21Z

[ART PR BUILD NOTIFIER]

Distgit: openshift-enterprise-tests
This PR has been included in build openshift-enterprise-tests-container-v4.19.0-202412180347.p0.g549f564.assembly.stream.el9.
All builds following this will include this PR.

openshift-ci-robot added the jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. label Dec 13, 2024

openshift-ci bot assigned dusk125 Dec 13, 2024

openshift-ci bot requested review from dusk125 and Elbehery December 13, 2024 18:53

openshift-ci bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Dec 13, 2024

openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Dec 13, 2024

openshift-ci bot mentioned this pull request Dec 13, 2024

CNTRLPLANE-1: Update to Kubernetes v1.32.0 openshift/kubernetes#2147

Open

bertinatto force-pushed the fix-tp-serial-etcd-data branch from b74a53b to 48ebd00 Compare December 14, 2024 01:31

openshift-ci bot removed the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Dec 14, 2024

Update etcd test data for 1.32 release

e2e4101

bertinatto force-pushed the fix-tp-serial-etcd-data branch from 48ebd00 to e2e4101 Compare December 16, 2024 13:52

openshift-ci bot mentioned this pull request Dec 16, 2024

DO NOT MERGE: ocp-next openshift/kubernetes#2148

Draft

dusk125 reviewed Dec 16, 2024

View reviewed changes

openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Dec 16, 2024

openshift-merge-bot bot merged commit 549f564 into openshift:master Dec 18, 2024
21 of 29 checks passed

CNTRLPLANE-1: Update etcd test data for 1.32 release #29376

CNTRLPLANE-1: Update etcd test data for 1.32 release #29376

Conversation

bertinatto commented Dec 13, 2024 • edited Loading

openshift-ci-robot commented Dec 13, 2024 • edited by openshift-ci bot Loading

openshift-ci-robot commented Dec 13, 2024 • edited by openshift-ci bot Loading

dusk125 commented Dec 13, 2024

bertinatto commented Dec 13, 2024

openshift-ci bot commented Dec 13, 2024

bertinatto commented Dec 13, 2024

openshift-trt bot commented Dec 13, 2024

openshift-ci-robot commented Dec 14, 2024

bertinatto commented Dec 14, 2024

openshift-ci bot commented Dec 14, 2024

openshift-trt bot commented Dec 14, 2024

bertinatto commented Dec 16, 2024

openshift-ci bot commented Dec 16, 2024

bertinatto commented Dec 16, 2024

openshift-ci bot commented Dec 16, 2024

dusk125 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

openshift-ci bot commented Dec 16, 2024

bertinatto commented Dec 16, 2024

bertinatto commented Dec 16, 2024

bertinatto commented Dec 16, 2024

bertinatto commented Dec 16, 2024

bertinatto commented Dec 16, 2024

dusk125 commented Dec 17, 2024

bertinatto commented Dec 17, 2024

bertinatto commented Dec 17, 2024

bertinatto commented Dec 17, 2024

openshift-ci-robot commented Dec 17, 2024

bertinatto commented Dec 17, 2024

bertinatto commented Dec 17, 2024

openshift-ci bot commented Dec 17, 2024 • edited Loading

bertinatto commented Dec 17, 2024

openshift-trt bot commented Dec 17, 2024

openshift-trt bot commented Dec 17, 2024

bertinatto commented Dec 17, 2024

openshift-bot commented Dec 18, 2024

bertinatto commented Dec 13, 2024 •

edited

Loading

openshift-ci-robot commented Dec 13, 2024 •

edited by openshift-ci bot

Loading

openshift-ci-robot commented Dec 13, 2024 •

edited by openshift-ci bot

Loading

openshift-ci bot commented Dec 17, 2024 •

edited

Loading