Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

change authorization_details to use credential_description from metadata #137

Conversation

paulbastian
Copy link
Contributor

Closes #102

Changes authorization_details to use credential_description pointing to the name of a credentials_supported object in the Credential Issuer's Metadata.

…ng to the name of a `credentials_supported` object in the Credential Issuer's Metadata
@peppelinux
Copy link
Member

I fully support this PR, it simplifies a lot by requiring the proper evaluation of the credential issuer metadata. This is a basic requirement that with the approach proposed in this PR is made stronger than before in the material implementations, removing any repetitions of values ​​which consequently require further checks

examples/authorization_details.json Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
examples/authorization_details.json Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
examples/authorization_details_ldp_vc.json Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
examples/authorization_details_mso_doc.json Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
examples/authorization_details_multiple_credentials.json Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
examples/authorization_details_multiple_credentials.json Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
examples/authorization_details_with_as.json Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
openid-4-verifiable-credential-issuance-1_0.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
openid-4-verifiable-credential-issuance-1_0.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
openid-4-verifiable-credential-issuance-1_0.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
openid-4-verifiable-credential-issuance-1_0.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@paulbastian
Copy link
Contributor Author

@Sakurann @jogu @peppelinux I went through the whole document again and saw that I've overseen some text in the Appendix E, therefore please review again.

@danielfett
Copy link
Contributor

Given that there seems to not be much of a controversy on the terminology proposed in #155, I wonder if we should go for credential_configuration_id here.

Copy link
Contributor

@awoie awoie left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm but it would be good shorten credential_identifiers and credential_identifier to credential_ids and credential_id.

@Sakurann
Copy link
Collaborator

Sakurann commented Dec 21, 2023

Given that there seems to not be much of a controversy on the terminology proposed in #155, I wonder if we should go for credential_configuration_id here.

opened a PR #162 pushing to this branch for that

@Sakurann Sakurann added this to the ID-1 milestone Dec 21, 2023
…etadata-in-authorization_details-authorization-request-parameter
Sakurann and others added 2 commits December 22, 2023 14:46
6 approvals. general agreement to merge this during Dec-21-2023 WG call. some comments remain to be addressed in other PRs (mainly 155), as this PR is scoped to change the parameter name changes and not to have a perfect terminology.

* change to credential_configuration_id

* change to credential_configurations_offered

* rename to credential_configurations_supported

* Apply suggestions from code review

Co-authored-by: Giuseppe De Marco <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Daniel Fett <[email protected]>

* rename to credential_configurations credential offer parameter

* clarify there is no polymorphism

Co-authored-by: Oliver Terbu <[email protected]>

* editorial

---------

Co-authored-by: Kristina <=>
Co-authored-by: Giuseppe De Marco <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Daniel Fett <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Oliver Terbu <[email protected]>
…etadata-in-authorization_details-authorization-request-parameter
@Sakurann Sakurann merged commit 12d5ede into main Dec 22, 2023
2 checks passed
jogu added a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 22, 2023
Sakurann pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 22, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Reuse Credential Offer identifier from metadata in authorization_details Authorization Request parameter
9 participants