chore(deps): bump plugins/memos-cloud from fd4bad4 to 09714e8

[dependabot]

Bumps plugins/memos-cloud from fd4bad4 to 09714e8.

Commits

• 09714e8 Merge pull request #153 from MemTensor/docs-sync/openclaw-cloud-main-source-r...
• d33d77f ci: publish reviewed main versions without action PRs
• 066f330 Merge pull request #152 from EF1874/test
• 50ae8cc Merge pull request #149 from MemTensor/docs-sync/openclaw-cloud-release-quality
• 1b02708 ci: surface cloud workflow contract failures
• 31a1749 ci: isolate read-only release dry runs
• 8ebc5f0 ci: declare reusable publish secret
• e941685 ci: minimize dry-run workflow privileges
• 6a8de04 ci: align prerelease and stable release channels
• 41201c0 ci: normalize cloud release evidence refs
• Additional commits viewable in compare view

Note
Automatic rebases have been disabled on this pull request as it has been open for over 30 days.

[clawsweeper]

Codex review: needs maintainer review before merge. Reviewed August 2, 2026, 2:48 PM ET / 18:48 UTC.

ClawSweeper review

What this changes

This PR advances Crabpot’s memos-cloud external-plugin fixture submodule from upstream commit fd4bad4 to 09714e8.

Merge readiness

⚠️ Ready for maintainer review - 4 items remain

This PR is still necessary: current main continues to pin memos-cloud at fd4bad4, while this clean one-file change selects 09714e8. CI exercised the recursively checked-out changed fixture and the fixture-lock security gate successfully, but the review environment could not materialize the upstream target commit for a source-level comparison; keep it open for a maintainer’s external-plugin security and compatibility approval.

Likely related people: Vincent Koc (high confidence) has the strongest recent fixture/security history; Peter Steinberger (medium confidence) authored the latest fixture refresh containing the current pin.

Priority: P3
Reviewed head: 068229cd373e06d9b7941600f06d42bf0029cc68
Owner decision: Required. See Decision needed.

Review scores

Measure	Result	What it means
Overall readiness	🦐 gold shrimp (3/6)	The patch is exceptionally focused and its relevant CI passed, but reviewer confidence is limited by the uninspectable upstream source and lockfile delta.
Proof confidence	🌊 off-meta tidepool	Not applicable: This Dependabot PR is exempt from the external-contributor proof gate; supplied CI successfully ran the recursively checked-out changed fixture and the fixture-lock security check.
Patch quality	🐚 platinum hermit (4/6)	Security review found an item that needs attention.

Verification

Check	Result	Evidence
Real behavior	Not applicable	Not applicable: This Dependabot PR is exempt from the external-contributor proof gate; supplied CI successfully ran the recursively checked-out changed fixture and the fixture-lock security check.
Evidence reviewed	7 items	Current main still uses the old revision: The current default-branch tree records plugins/memos-cloud at fd4bad4, so the PR's target revision is not already implemented on main. Submitted change is narrowly scoped: The PR head changes exactly one gitlink, from fd4bad4 to 09714e8, with no Crabpot script, configuration, or workflow edits. Fixture contract is configuration-driven: memos-cloud is a medium-priority cloud-memory fixture expected to expose legacy hook registration and lifecycle hooks; its stated seam includes config UI and external MemOS API use.
Findings	None	None.
Security	Needs attention	Review the selected external plugin revision: This gitlink changes the executable external plugin source used by the fixture, including cloud API behavior and dependencies; local inspection could not materialize 09714e8, so a maintainer should compare the upstream delta before accepting the new trust boundary.

How this fits together

Crabpot declares third-party plugin fixtures in crabpot.config.json and stores their selected source revisions as Git submodules. Those revisions are recursively checked out for static, isolated-fixture, and lockfile-security validation before contributing to compatibility reports.

flowchart LR
  A[Fixture configuration] --> B[memos-cloud fixture]
  B --> C[Submodule revision]
  C --> D[Recursive checkout]
  D --> E[Isolated fixture checks]
  D --> F[Lockfile security audit]
  E --> G[Compatibility reports]
  F --> G[Compatibility reports]

Loading

Decision needed

Question	Recommendation
Should Crabpot accept 09714e8 as the reviewed memos-cloud fixture revision despite the new external cloud-memory plugin code not being source-inspectable in this review environment?	Review upstream delta, then merge: Compare the upstream revision and its lockfile changes, and merge this focused pin if the cloud-memory and dependency changes are acceptable.

Why: The repository's CI proves checkout, fixture compatibility, and the lockfile audit, but the change selects third-party executable code with external API behavior; accepting that trust-boundary change requires maintainer intent.

Before merge

• Resolve security concern: Review the selected external plugin revision - This gitlink changes the executable external plugin source used by the fixture, including cloud API behavior and dependencies; local inspection could not materialize 09714e8, so a maintainer should compare the upstream delta before accepting the new trust boundary.
• Resolve merge risk (P1) - Merging selects a new third-party cloud-memory plugin revision that participates in legacy hooks, configuration UI code, and external MemOS API access; green fixture checks do not replace a review of the upstream code and lockfile delta.
• Resolve merge risk (P1) - The target upstream commit could not be materialized in this read-only environment, so the exact upstream implementation and dependency changes remain uninspected locally.

Findings

• [medium] Review the selected external plugin revision — plugins/memos-cloud:1

Agent review details

Security

Needs attention: The repository-side security gate passed, but this PR selects a new third-party cloud-memory plugin revision whose source and lockfile delta could not be inspected locally.

Review metrics

Metric	Value	Why it matters
Patch scope	1 gitlink changed; 1 addition, 1 deletion	The branch does not modify Crabpot-owned implementation, configuration, tests, or workflows.
Relevant validation	5 check categories passed	The supplied results include isolated changed-fixture validation, fixture-lock security, container static checks, three-platform static checks, and the default track.

Root-cause cluster

Relationship: canonical
Canonical: #264
Summary: This PR is the current canonical attempt to advance the same memos-cloud pin after the earlier lower-revision Dependabot PR was closed unmerged.

Members:

• superseded: chore(deps): bump plugins/memos-cloud from fd4bad4 to 066f330 #260 - It proposed an earlier memos-cloud target (066f330) from the same base revision and was closed unmerged before this newer update was opened.

Proposal only: this assessment does not dispatch repair, suppress jobs, mutate sibling items, close, or merge anything.

Merge-risk options

Maintainer options:

1. Review the upstream revision before merging (recommended)
   Compare the plugin and lockfile delta from fd4bad4 to 09714e8, then merge the existing focused gitlink update if its hooks, dependency graph, and cloud API behavior remain acceptable.
2. Accept the CI-backed fixture update
   Maintainers may accept the remaining external-code review risk based on the successful recursive checkout, isolated-fixture, static, and fixture-lock security checks.

Technical review

Best possible solution:

Have a fixture/security owner compare the upstream fd4bad4..09714e8 delta, confirm the expected hooks and package-lock posture remain acceptable, then merge the existing one-line pin if that review agrees with the successful CI results.

Do we have a high-confidence way to reproduce the issue?

Not applicable: this is a fixture-revision maintenance PR rather than a report of broken behavior. The submitted revision did receive current PR CI coverage through recursive checkout and the isolated changed-fixture job.

Is this the best way to solve the issue?

Unclear: a one-line submodule pin is the correct repository-level mechanism, but accepting this particular upstream revision is safest after a maintainer reviews the unavailable upstream source and lockfile delta.

AGENTS.md: found and applied where relevant.

Codex review notes: model internal, reasoning high; reviewed against 7d89a9f09475.

Labels

Label changes:

• add rating: 🦐 gold shrimp: Overall readiness is 🦐 gold shrimp; proof is 🌊 off-meta tidepool and patch quality is 🐚 platinum hermit.
• add status: ⏳ waiting on author: ClawSweeper has contributor-facing work open and is waiting for author action. Not applicable: This Dependabot PR is exempt from the external-contributor proof gate; supplied CI successfully ran the recursively checked-out changed fixture and the fixture-lock security check.
• remove rating: 🧂 unranked krab: Current PR rating is rating: 🦐 gold shrimp, so this older rating label is no longer current.
• remove status: 📣 needs proof: Current PR status label is status: ⏳ waiting on author.

Label justifications:

• P3: This is a routine external fixture revision update, with no demonstrated user-facing regression.
• merge-risk: 🚨 compatibility: The new revision can alter the fixture's legacy hook registrations or its OpenClaw compatibility behavior even though the current isolated check passed.
• merge-risk: 🚨 security-boundary: The gitlink selects a new third-party cloud-memory plugin revision with external API and dependency behavior that requires maintainer trust-boundary approval.
• rating: 🦐 gold shrimp: Overall readiness is 🦐 gold shrimp; proof is 🌊 off-meta tidepool and patch quality is 🐚 platinum hermit.
• status: ⏳ waiting on author: ClawSweeper has contributor-facing work open and is waiting for author action. Not applicable: This Dependabot PR is exempt from the external-contributor proof gate; supplied CI successfully ran the recursively checked-out changed fixture and the fixture-lock security check.

Evidence

Security concerns:

• [medium] Review the selected external plugin revision — plugins/memos-cloud:1
  This gitlink changes the executable external plugin source used by the fixture, including cloud API behavior and dependencies; local inspection could not materialize 09714e8, so a maintainer should compare the upstream delta before accepting the new trust boundary.
  Confidence: 0.91

What I checked:

• Current main still uses the old revision: The current default-branch tree records plugins/memos-cloud at fd4bad4, so the PR's target revision is not already implemented on main. (plugins/memos-cloud:1, 7d89a9f09475)
• Submitted change is narrowly scoped: The PR head changes exactly one gitlink, from fd4bad4 to 09714e8, with no Crabpot script, configuration, or workflow edits. (plugins/memos-cloud:1, 068229cd373e)
• Fixture contract is configuration-driven: memos-cloud is a medium-priority cloud-memory fixture expected to expose legacy hook registration and lifecycle hooks; its stated seam includes config UI and external MemOS API use. (crabpot.config.json:1412, 7d89a9f09475)
• Repository validation covers changed submodules: The default workflow recursively checks out submodules and runs static compatibility validation; the supplied PR check results show successful isolated memos-cloud validation, fixture-lock security, container checks, and three OS static-check runs. (.github/workflows/check.yml:72, 7d89a9f09475)
• Security gate audits fixture locks: The fixture-lock gate runs npm audit --package-lock-only --omit=dev for fixture lockfiles and fails on refreshable high or critical findings; the corresponding PR check passed. (scripts/check-fixture-security.mjs:29, 7d89a9f09475)
• Recent fixture ownership history: The current old pin dates to Peter Steinberger's chore(deps): refresh plugin fixtures (#249) commit, while Vincent Koc most recently maintained fixture refresh and lock-security behavior on main. (plugins/memos-cloud:1, b92a5b604375)

Likely related people:

• Vincent Koc: Introduced the memory/security fixture coverage and most recently changed fixture refresh and fixture-lock security behavior on current main. (role: recent area contributor; confidence: high; commits: 8335a48dd21a, 90fe18e5c020, 7d89a9f09475; files: crabpot.config.json, plugins/memos-cloud, scripts/check-fixture-security.mjs)
• Peter Steinberger: Authored the latest broad plugin-fixture refresh that established the current fd4bad4 pointer and has prior release/fixture maintenance history. (role: recent fixture refresh author; confidence: medium; commits: b92a5b604375, 6fa484838545; files: plugins/memos-cloud, crabpot.config.json)

Rank-up moves

Optional improvements that raise the rating; they are not merge blockers.

• Have a fixture/security owner compare the upstream fd4bad4..09714e8 changes before merge.

Rating scale

Score	Internal tier	Crab rank	Meaning
6/6	S	🦀 challenger crab	Exceptional readiness
5/6	A	🦞 diamond lobster	Very strong readiness
4/6	B	🐚 platinum hermit	Good normal PR; ordinary maintainer review
3/6	C	🦐 gold shrimp	Useful, but confidence is limited
2/6	D	🦪 silver shellfish	Proof or implementation needs work
1/6	F	🧂 unranked krab	Not merge-ready
N/A	NA	🌊 off-meta tidepool	Rating does not apply

Overall follows the weaker of proof and patch quality.
Shiny media proof means a screenshot, video, or linked artifact directly shows the changed behavior. Runtime, network, CSP, and security claims still need visible diagnostics.

Workflow

• ClawSweeper keeps one durable marker-backed review comment per issue or PR.
• Re-runs edit this comment so the latest verdict, findings, and automation markers stay together instead of adding duplicate bot comments.
• A fresh review can be triggered by eligible @clawsweeper re-review comments, exact-item GitHub events, scheduled/background review runs, or manual workflow dispatch.
• PR/issue authors and users with repository write access can comment @clawsweeper re-review or @clawsweeper re-run on an open PR or issue to request a fresh review only.
• Maintainers can also comment @clawsweeper review to request a fresh review only.
• Fresh-review commands do not start repair, autofix, rebase, CI repair, or automerge.
• Maintainer-only repair and merge flows require explicit commands such as @clawsweeper autofix, @clawsweeper automerge, @clawsweeper fix ci, or @clawsweeper address review.
• Maintainers can comment @clawsweeper explain to ask for more context, or @clawsweeper stop to stop active automation.

History

Review history (22 earlier review cycles; latest 8 shown)

• reviewed 2026-08-01T10:22:34.521Z sha 068229c :: needs maintainer review before merge. :: none
• reviewed 2026-08-01T13:12:16.602Z sha 068229c :: needs maintainer review before merge. :: none
• reviewed 2026-08-01T16:10:44.982Z sha 068229c :: needs maintainer review before merge. :: none
• reviewed 2026-08-01T18:44:42.069Z sha 068229c :: needs maintainer review before merge. :: none
• reviewed 2026-08-01T21:23:08.939Z sha 068229c :: needs maintainer review before merge. :: none
• reviewed 2026-08-02T05:07:48.284Z sha 068229c :: needs maintainer review before merge. :: none
• reviewed 2026-08-02T11:53:18.748Z sha 068229c :: needs maintainer review before merge. :: none
• reviewed 2026-08-02T15:26:05.224Z sha 068229c :: needs maintainer review before merge. :: none