chore(deps): bump plugins/memos-cloud from fd4bad4 to 066f330

[dependabot]

Bumps plugins/memos-cloud from fd4bad4 to 066f330.

Commits

• 066f330 Merge pull request #152 from EF1874/test
• 50ae8cc Merge pull request #149 from MemTensor/docs-sync/openclaw-cloud-release-quality
• 1b02708 ci: surface cloud workflow contract failures
• 31a1749 ci: isolate read-only release dry runs
• 8ebc5f0 ci: declare reusable publish secret
• e941685 ci: minimize dry-run workflow privileges
• 6a8de04 ci: align prerelease and stable release channels
• 41201c0 ci: normalize cloud release evidence refs
• 8517603 ci: close cloud release failure recovery gaps
• 58d9efa ci: preserve reusable workflow token permissions
• Additional commits viewable in compare view

Dependabot will resolve any conflicts with this PR as long as you don't alter it yourself. You can also trigger a rebase manually by commenting @dependabot rebase.

---

Dependabot commands and options

You can trigger Dependabot actions by commenting on this PR:

• @dependabot rebase will rebase this PR
• @dependabot recreate will recreate this PR, overwriting any edits that have been made to it
• @dependabot show <dependency name> ignore conditions will show all of the ignore conditions of the specified dependency
• @dependabot ignore this major version will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this major version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)
• @dependabot ignore this minor version will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this minor version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)
• @dependabot ignore this dependency will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this dependency (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)

[clawsweeper]

Codex review: found issues before merge. Reviewed July 28, 2026, 5:12 AM ET / 09:12 UTC.

ClawSweeper review

What this changes

The PR advances the memos-cloud plugin submodule from commit fd4bad4 to 066f330.

Merge readiness

⚠️ Ready for maintainer review - 4 items remain

Keep this PR open, but do not merge it as-is: it advances an external plugin submodule that is not registered in the repository’s fixture configuration, so the intended inspection seam and expected report coverage are not reviewable from configuration.

Priority: P3
Reviewed head: 11fcffc6cdc0760e7424dcdb63fb75f5b9b460d1
Owner decision: Required. See Decision needed.

Review scores

Measure	Result	What it means
Overall readiness	🦐 gold shrimp (3/6)	The one-line update is narrowly scoped, but its fixture contract is incomplete because current configuration does not declare the changed plugin.
Proof confidence	🌊 off-meta tidepool	Not applicable: This Dependabot bot PR updates a fixture source pointer; the external-contributor real-behavior-proof gate does not apply, while the repository’s isolated changed-fixture checks remain the relevant validation.
Patch quality	🦐 gold shrimp (3/6)	1 actionable review finding remain.

Verification

Check	Result	Evidence
Real behavior	Not applicable	Not applicable: This Dependabot bot PR updates a fixture source pointer; the external-contributor real-behavior-proof gate does not apply, while the repository’s isolated changed-fixture checks remain the relevant validation.
Evidence reviewed	4 items	Proposed submodule update: The branch changes exactly one gitlink, advancing plugins/memos-cloud from fd4bad4cbe66bb767d33d08d681eaea03ccb353a to 066f330d00c710ee3e618312c145f58c51c0d84c. Fixture configuration gap: Current-main inspection of crabpot.config.json found no entry matching memos-cloud, MemOS, or the plugin path, despite the tracked submodule being changed by this PR. Repository fixture policy: The repository policy requires plugins to be added through crabpot.config.json, keeps fixtures source-driven rather than script-hardcoded, and requires each added fixture to state the unique seam it covers in why.
Findings	1 actionable finding	[P2] Register the changed submodule as a fixture
Security	None	None.

How this fits together

Crabpot evaluates configured external-plugin fixtures with the plugin inspector and publishes checks and reports from those fixture inputs. This PR changes the source revision for the memos-cloud plugin input, which can affect the inspection results produced by the changed-fixture matrix.

flowchart LR
  A[Fixture configuration] --> C[Changed fixture matrix]
  B[Memos Cloud submodule] --> C
  C --> D[Plugin inspector]
  D --> E[Checks and reports]

Loading

Decision needed

Question	Recommendation
Should plugins/memos-cloud remain a supported Crabpot fixture, with declared seam metadata and expectations, or should this repository stop advancing the unconfigured submodule?	Register the fixture: Add a memos-cloud fixture entry with its unique seam, why, and matching generated report or test expectations before updating the gitlink.

Why: The repository policy requires fixture ownership in configuration, but choosing whether to retain this external plugin as a fixture is a product and test-corpus decision rather than a safe mechanical correction.

Before merge

• Register the changed submodule as a fixture (P2) - plugins/memos-cloud is advanced here, but current crabpot.config.json has no matching fixture entry. That leaves the changed-fixture CI input without the required declared seam, why, and expected inspection contract; add the configuration and related expectations, or do not advance this unconfigured gitlink.
• Resolve merge risk (P1) - Merging an unconfigured external-source revision leaves no declared fixture seam or report expectation for a changed input that the CI matrix treats as a fixture.
• Resolve merge risk (P1) - The upstream range includes workflow-oriented commits; although the gitlink itself does not execute those workflows, the external plugin source should remain explicitly owned and inspectable through fixture configuration before its revision changes.

Findings

• [P2] Register the changed submodule as a fixture — plugins/memos-cloud:1

Agent review details

Security

None.

Review metrics

Metric	Value	Why it matters
Patch surface	1 file changed; 1 gitlink advanced	The entire PR changes the external source consumed by the isolated changed-fixture automation, so fixture ownership must be visible in configuration.

Merge-risk options

Maintainer options:

1. Declare the fixture contract (recommended)
   Before merge, add the configured memos-cloud fixture metadata and update the expected generated inspection output for the new revision.
2. Defer the bump
   Close or defer this dependency update if maintainers do not intend to support memos-cloud as a configured fixture.

Technical review

Best possible solution:

Either register memos-cloud as a configured fixture with its unique seam labels, why, and updated report/test expectations, or leave the unused gitlink unchanged until the repository intentionally adopts it as a fixture.

Do we have a high-confidence way to reproduce the issue?

Not applicable: this is a dependency-submodule update rather than a report of failing runtime behavior; the configuration mismatch is directly inspectable from current main and the proposed gitlink diff.

Is this the best way to solve the issue?

No. Advancing an external plugin source without declaring it in the fixture configuration conflicts with the repository’s fixture-driven policy; configuration and expected-output ownership should accompany the update.

Full review comments:

• [P2] Register the changed submodule as a fixture — plugins/memos-cloud:1
plugins/memos-cloud is advanced here, but current crabpot.config.json has no matching fixture entry. That leaves the changed-fixture CI input without the required declared seam, why, and expected inspection contract; add the configuration and related expectations, or do not advance this unconfigured gitlink.
  Confidence: 0.93

Overall correctness: patch is incorrect
Overall confidence: 0.9

AGENTS.md: found and applied where relevant.

Codex review notes: model internal, reasoning high; reviewed against 47cdaa2926bc.

Labels

Label changes:

• add P3: This is a low-urgency fixture-maintenance and reviewability gap rather than a demonstrated user-facing regression.
• add merge-risk: 🚨 automation: The PR changes an external fixture source used by the changed-fixture matrix without a matching configuration entry that defines its inspection contract.
• add rating: 🦐 gold shrimp: Overall readiness is 🦐 gold shrimp; proof is 🌊 off-meta tidepool and patch quality is 🦐 gold shrimp.
• add status: ⏳ waiting on author: ClawSweeper has contributor-facing work open and is waiting for author action. Not applicable: This Dependabot bot PR updates a fixture source pointer; the external-contributor real-behavior-proof gate does not apply, while the repository’s isolated changed-fixture checks remain the relevant validation.

Label justifications:

• P3: This is a low-urgency fixture-maintenance and reviewability gap rather than a demonstrated user-facing regression.
• merge-risk: 🚨 automation: The PR changes an external fixture source used by the changed-fixture matrix without a matching configuration entry that defines its inspection contract.
• rating: 🦐 gold shrimp: Overall readiness is 🦐 gold shrimp; proof is 🌊 off-meta tidepool and patch quality is 🦐 gold shrimp.
• status: ⏳ waiting on author: ClawSweeper has contributor-facing work open and is waiting for author action. Not applicable: This Dependabot bot PR updates a fixture source pointer; the external-contributor real-behavior-proof gate does not apply, while the repository’s isolated changed-fixture checks remain the relevant validation.

Evidence

What I checked:

• Proposed submodule update: The branch changes exactly one gitlink, advancing plugins/memos-cloud from fd4bad4cbe66bb767d33d08d681eaea03ccb353a to 066f330d00c710ee3e618312c145f58c51c0d84c. (plugins/memos-cloud:1, 11fcffc6cdc0)
• Fixture configuration gap: Current-main inspection of crabpot.config.json found no entry matching memos-cloud, MemOS, or the plugin path, despite the tracked submodule being changed by this PR. (crabpot.config.json, 47cdaa2926bc)
• Repository fixture policy: The repository policy requires plugins to be added through crabpot.config.json, keeps fixtures source-driven rather than script-hardcoded, and requires each added fixture to state the unique seam it covers in why. (AGENTS.md:3, 47cdaa2926bc)
• Existing automation scope: The PR check matrix explicitly includes an isolated changed-fixture run for memos-cloud, so its revision is an input to repository automation even though the corresponding fixture metadata is absent from the reviewed configuration. (plugins/memos-cloud:1, 11fcffc6cdc0)

Likely related people:

• MemTensor: The proposed revision is from the MemTensor-owned MemOS-Cloud-OpenClaw-Plugin repository, making this handle the best available owner for the updated external source behavior. (role: upstream plugin owner; confidence: medium; commits: 066f330d00c7; files: plugins/memos-cloud)
• openclaw: The remaining decision is whether this submodule is a supported Crabpot fixture and, if so, how its seam and expectations should be represented in repository configuration. (role: fixture configuration follow-up owner; confidence: low; commits: 47cdaa2926bc; files: crabpot.config.json, AGENTS.md)

Rank-up moves

Optional improvements that raise the rating; they are not merge blockers.

• Add the configured fixture entry with its unique seam and why.
• Update the generated report or test expectations and let the isolated changed-fixture check complete.

Rating scale

Score	Internal tier	Crab rank	Meaning
6/6	S	🦀 challenger crab	Exceptional readiness
5/6	A	🦞 diamond lobster	Very strong readiness
4/6	B	🐚 platinum hermit	Good normal PR; ordinary maintainer review
3/6	C	🦐 gold shrimp	Useful, but confidence is limited
2/6	D	🦪 silver shellfish	Proof or implementation needs work
1/6	F	🧂 unranked krab	Not merge-ready
N/A	NA	🌊 off-meta tidepool	Rating does not apply

Overall follows the weaker of proof and patch quality.
Shiny media proof means a screenshot, video, or linked artifact directly shows the changed behavior. Runtime, network, CSP, and security claims still need visible diagnostics.

Workflow

• ClawSweeper keeps one durable marker-backed review comment per issue or PR.
• Re-runs edit this comment so the latest verdict, findings, and automation markers stay together instead of adding duplicate bot comments.
• A fresh review can be triggered by eligible @clawsweeper re-review comments, exact-item GitHub events, scheduled/background review runs, or manual workflow dispatch.
• PR/issue authors and users with repository write access can comment @clawsweeper re-review or @clawsweeper re-run on an open PR or issue to request a fresh review only.
• Maintainers can also comment @clawsweeper review to request a fresh review only.
• Fresh-review commands do not start repair, autofix, rebase, CI repair, or automerge.
• Maintainer-only repair and merge flows require explicit commands such as @clawsweeper autofix, @clawsweeper automerge, @clawsweeper fix ci, or @clawsweeper address review.
• Maintainers can comment @clawsweeper explain to ask for more context, or @clawsweeper stop to stop active automation.

[dependabot]

Superseded by #264.