-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 88
tests(transformers): increase the OLMo models test error passing threshold for BF16 #1358
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
Summary of ChangesHello @townwish4git, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed! This pull request addresses an issue with test stability for OLMo models when operating in BF16 precision. By adjusting the error tolerance, the change ensures that tests accurately reflect valid model behavior, thereby reducing spurious failures and improving the overall reliability of the testing suite for these specific model configurations. Highlights
Using Gemini Code AssistThe full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips. Invoking Gemini You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either
Customization To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a Limitations & Feedback Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here. You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension. Footnotes
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Code Review
This pull request increases the error threshold for bf16
data type in the OLMo and OLMo2 model tests to prevent flaky test failures. The change is straightforward and justified. I've added comments regarding code duplication of the threshold constants, suggesting a refactor to improve maintainability.
from tests.transformers_tests.models.modeling_common import ids_numpy | ||
|
||
DTYPE_AND_THRESHOLDS = {"fp32": 5e-4, "fp16": 5e-3, "bf16": 5e-3} | ||
DTYPE_AND_THRESHOLDS = {"fp32": 5e-4, "fp16": 5e-3, "bf16": 1e-2} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This DTYPE_AND_THRESHOLDS
constant is also defined in tests/transformers_tests/models/olmo2/test_modeling_omo2.py
. To improve maintainability and prevent potential inconsistencies, consider moving this constant to a shared module like tests/transformers_tests/models/modeling_common.py
and importing it in both test files.
from tests.transformers_tests.models.modeling_common import ids_numpy | ||
|
||
DTYPE_AND_THRESHOLDS = {"fp32": 5e-4, "fp16": 5e-3, "bf16": 5e-3} | ||
DTYPE_AND_THRESHOLDS = {"fp32": 5e-4, "fp16": 5e-3, "bf16": 1e-2} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This DTYPE_AND_THRESHOLDS
constant is also defined in tests/transformers_tests/models/olmo/test_modeling_olmo.py
. To improve maintainability and prevent potential inconsistencies, consider moving this constant to a shared module like tests/transformers_tests/models/modeling_common.py
and importing it in both test files.
What does this PR do?
Increase the OLMo models test error passing threshold for BF16 to avoid unnecessary test failures for valid results.
refer to: #1357
Before submitting
What's New
. Here are thedocumentation guidelines
Who can review?
Anyone in the community is free to review the PR once the tests have passed. Feel free to tag
members/contributors who may be interested in your PR.
@xxx