Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore: Calendarの内部処理を整理する #5346

Open
wants to merge 50 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

AtsushiM
Copy link
Member

関連URL

概要

変更内容

確認方法

@yagimushi yagimushi force-pushed the chore-refactoring-Calendar branch from 01bc342 to 8a18400 Compare January 29, 2025 03:58
Copy link

pkg-pr-new bot commented Jan 29, 2025

Open in Stackblitz

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/kufu/smarthr-ui@5346

commit: 96410ea

@yagimushi yagimushi force-pushed the chore-refactoring-Calendar branch from 8a18400 to 1c2384a Compare January 29, 2025 05:10
@yagimushi yagimushi force-pushed the chore-refactoring-Calendar branch from e9a39e5 to 5a054a4 Compare January 29, 2025 05:19
Comment on lines +39 to +56
const result: Array<Array<number | null>> = []

for (let weekIndex = 0; weekIndex < numOfWeek; weekIndex++) {
// 週毎の配列を形成
const startDateInWeek = weekIndex * 7 - startDay + 1
return Array.from({ length: 7 }).map((__, dateIndex) => {
const weekNumbers: Array<number | null> = []

for (let dateIndex = 0; dateIndex < 7; dateIndex++) {
// 1週の配列を形成
const dateNum = startDateInWeek + dateIndex

return dateNum > 0 && dateNum <= lastDate ? dateNum : null
})
})
weekNumbers[dateIndex] = dateNum > 0 && dateNum <= lastDate ? dateNum : null
}

result[weekIndex] = weekNumbers
}

return result
Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Array.from({ length: X }) で特定の長さの配列を作ったあとmap... という思考の流れが微妙にわかりづらく、またネストしていることがそれを助長してしまっているので

  • 純粋に空配列を作成
  • 空配列に対してforで何回ループするのかを明示

することで配列の生成とループ回数を明確に分離しました
(一応forのほうが高速だし...)

const lastDate = dayjs(date).add(1, 'month').date(0).date()
const day = dayjs(date)
const startDay = day.date(1).day()
const lastDate = day.add(1, 'month').date(0).date()
Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

dayjsのdateやaddメソッドは別オブジェクトを生成するため、dayjs自体の実行結果を別変数にしました。
こうすることでメソッド呼び出し、実行のコストが浮きます

Comment on lines +64 to +71
const length = Math.max(Math.min(toYear, 9999) - fromYear + 1, 0)
const result: number[] = []

for (let i = 0; i < length; i++) {
result[i] = fromYear + i
}

return result
Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

元の処理では

  • numOfYear分の長さの配列を生成
  • その後nillで全部埋める
  • その後nullを無視してindexを元に年を計算....

とかなり無駄な処理をしてしまっていました。
結局何回ループするのか? が微妙に分かりづらいので

  • 空配列を生成
  • 空配列に対してindexを元に年を計算して詰める

ようにロジックを変更しました

},
})

export const YearPicker: FC<Props & ElementProps> = ({
export const YearPicker: FC<Props & ElementProps> = ({ isDisplayed, ...rest }) =>
isDisplayed ? <ActualYearPicker {...rest} /> : null
Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

isDisplayedではない場合でYearPickerを常に計算するようになっていたため、
他コンポーネントと合わせて、そもそも表示しない場合はロジックを実行しないようにしました。
年の選択UIはそもそも利用されない可能性も十分に有るため、既存のロジックより効率的なはずです

const fromDay = dayjs(from)
const toDay = dayjs(to)
// HINT: dayjsのisSameは文字列でも比較可能なため、cacheが効きやすいstringにする
const nowDateStr = dayjs().startOf('date').toString()
Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

nowの情報が欲しいため、memo化できません。
ただここで生成する文字列は1日単位なのでキャシュしちゃってもいいかもですが...

Comment on lines +67 to +86
const formattedFrom = useMemo(() => {
const date = getFromDate(from)
const day = dayjs(date)

return {
day,
date,
year: day.year(),
}
}, [from])
const formattedTo = useMemo(() => {
const date = getToDate(to)
const day = dayjs(date)

return {
day,
date,
year: day.year(),
}
}, [to])
Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

from, to はほぼ固定で変わる可能性は低いため、memo化しています
またこれらをベースに計算される値も同様です

@AtsushiM AtsushiM marked this pull request as ready for review February 3, 2025 22:37
@AtsushiM AtsushiM requested a review from a team as a code owner February 3, 2025 22:37
@AtsushiM AtsushiM requested review from misako0927 and hiroki0525 and removed request for a team February 3, 2025 22:37
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant