Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Adding more container runtime sockets #497

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Aug 13, 2023
Merged

Adding more container runtime sockets #497

merged 3 commits into from
Aug 13, 2023

Conversation

amitschendel
Copy link
Contributor

Overview

Adding more runtime types to c-0074

@codiumai-pr-agent-free
Copy link
Contributor

PR Analysis

  • 🎯 Main theme: Extending the security check for container runtime sockets
  • 📌 Type of PR: Enhancement
  • Focused PR: True
  • 🔒 Security concerns: No security concerns found

PR Feedback

  • General suggestions: The PR is well-structured and focused on a specific enhancement, which is extending the security check for container runtime sockets. However, it would be beneficial to include tests that validate the new functionality.

  • 🤖 Code feedback:

    • relevant file: rules/containers-mounting-docker-socket/raw.rego
      suggestion: Consider refactoring the is_runtime_socket_mounting function to use an array of socket paths, and then check if host_path.path is in this array. This would make the code more maintainable and scalable, as adding a new socket path would only require updating the array, not adding a new function call. [important]
      relevant line: is_runtime_socket_mounting(host_path) {

    • relevant file: rules/containers-mounting-docker-socket/raw.rego
      suggestion: The alert message still refers to "Docker internals". It would be more accurate to change this to "container runtime internals" to reflect the new functionality. [medium]
      relevant line: "alertMessage": sprintf("volume: %v in %v: %v has mounting to Docker internals.", [ volume.name, wl.kind, wl.metadata.name]),

How to use

To invoke the PR-Agent, add a comment using one of the following commands:
/review [-i]: Request a review of your Pull Request. For an incremental review, which only considers changes since the last review, include the '-i' option.
/describe: Modify the PR title and description based on the contents of the PR.
/improve: Suggest improvements to the code in the PR.
/ask <QUESTION>: Pose a question about the PR.

To edit any configuration parameter from 'configuration.toml', add --config_path=new_value
For example: /review --pr_reviewer.extra_instructions="focus on the file: ..."
To list the possible configuration parameters, use the /config command.

@amitschendel amitschendel linked an issue Aug 13, 2023 that may be closed by this pull request
@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

Summary:

  • License scan: failure
  • Credentials scan: success
  • Vulnerabilities scan: failure
  • Unit test: success
  • Go linting: success

Copy link
Collaborator

@YiscahLevySilas1 YiscahLevySilas1 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

please add a test for the new cases

Copy link

@github-advanced-security github-advanced-security bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

kubescape found more than 10 potential problems in the proposed changes. Check the Files changed tab for more details.

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

Summary:

  • License scan: failure
  • Credentials scan: success
  • Vulnerabilities scan: failure
  • Unit test: success
  • Go linting: success

@YiscahLevySilas1 YiscahLevySilas1 merged commit 3a321c9 into master Aug 13, 2023
26 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Add support for more container runtimes - C-0074
2 participants