Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix block verbosedata population… #2275

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Mar 18, 2025

Conversation

TMKCodes
Copy link
Contributor

@TMKCodes TMKCodes commented May 5, 2024

Fix block verbosedata population from skipping transaction verbosedata population when BlockInfo errorenously reports block as Header only, but domainBlock is still fount with GetBlockEvenIfHeaderOnly.

Basically this affects archival servers. Once archival server moves on pruning point it loses verboseData from transactions as such transaction id is lost unless repopulated from the block data.

…a population when BlockInfo errorenously reports block as Header only, but domainBlock is still fount with GetBlockEvenIfHeaderOnly.
@michaelsutton michaelsutton changed the base branch from master to dev May 9, 2024 09:59

Verified

This commit was created on GitHub.com and signed with GitHub’s verified signature.
@bobpinella
Copy link

We are currently running an archive node and need this fix badly - will this PR be incorporated into the next version anytime soon?

@bobpinella
Copy link

bobpinella commented Sep 18, 2024

I just noticed that this version of kaspad has been deprecated. We have confirmed that this is not an issue with the Rust version.

Verified

This commit was created on GitHub.com and signed with GitHub’s verified signature.
@someone235 someone235 force-pushed the dev branch 2 times, most recently from 46111bb to c23c1d1 Compare March 18, 2025 08:59
@someone235 someone235 force-pushed the bug-block-verbosedata branch from dc8c832 to 3ec0ee1 Compare March 18, 2025 09:00
@someone235 someone235 merged commit ed745a9 into kaspanet:dev Mar 18, 2025
4 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants