Skip to content

Conversation

akshatsinha0
Copy link

Use off_t for lseek() result and cast to bo size


atomic_set(&bo_gem->refcount, 1);

atomic_set(&bo_gem->refcount, 1);//
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

DecodeStatusReportData tempNewReport;
MOS_ZeroMemory(&tempNewReport, sizeof(CodechalDecodeStatusReport));
MOS_ZeroMemory(&tempNewReport, sizeof(tempNewReport));
//MOS_ZeroMemory(&tempNewReport, sizeof(CodechalDecodeStatusReport));
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

remove older one?

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

You mean delete it from commented?

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

yes, remove it ,

@XinfengZhang
Copy link
Contributor

thanks @akshatsinha0 , it LGTM, but about the commits, looks the third one is just to remove the sentence which was commented in previous changes. so , maybe we should squash them?

@akshatsinha0
Copy link
Author

thanks @akshatsinha0 , it LGTM, but about the commits, looks the third one is just to remove the sentence which was commented in previous changes. so , maybe we should squash them?

Yah, obvious is to squash the last one with the first two, or what do you say, squash all 3 into 1?

@akshatsinha0
Copy link
Author

see, I split it into two fixup! commits and autosquashed them(with functional ones),& regularly pushed the branch. so Is it ok now?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants