Skip to content

Conversation

@matiasgarciaisaia
Copy link
Member

The issue was caused while trying to fix #1299 with ce43567 and 1d5cfbf

Instead of excluding zero-quota buckets, we assume they're always full, so they get properly shown in the table.

See #2378

@matiasgarciaisaia matiasgarciaisaia force-pushed the fix/2378-rejected-in-disposition-table branch 2 times, most recently from 65f55fb to 0f29102 Compare September 10, 2025 02:13
The issue was caused while trying to fix #1299 with ce43567
and 1d5cfbf

Instead of excluding zero-quota buckets, we assume they're always full,
so they get properly shown in the table.

See #2378
@matiasgarciaisaia matiasgarciaisaia force-pushed the fix/2378-rejected-in-disposition-table branch from 0f29102 to 5da9b66 Compare September 10, 2025 20:23
@matiasgarciaisaia matiasgarciaisaia merged commit 0ae5ace into main Sep 10, 2025
2 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Assigning zero to a quota throws internal server error.

2 participants