Split update-project into create-project and update-project safe outputs

[Copilot]

Summary of Changes

Addressed all PR feedback from @pelikhan:

1. Changed default max from 10 to 1 for create-project

   • Updated in create_project.go, safe_outputs.go, main_workflow_schema.json, and documentation

2. Moved generateCampaignId to separate helper file

   • Created project_helpers.cjs with generateCampaignId and new normalizeProjectName functions
   • Added extensive test suite in project_helpers.test.cjs (28 tests covering edge cases)

3. Added project name normalization

   • Project names are now trimmed of whitespace before use
   • Validation ensures proper error messages for invalid inputs

4. Removed PROJECT_GITHUB_TOKEN handling

   • Token is now properly configured via github-token parameter in step's with section
   • GitHub client automatically uses the configured token
   • Updated error messages to reference github-token configuration instead

Files Modified

• pkg/workflow/create_project.go - Changed default max to 1
• pkg/workflow/safe_outputs.go - Changed default max to 1
• pkg/parser/schemas/main_workflow_schema.json - Updated schema defaults
• docs/src/content/docs/reference/safe-outputs.md - Updated documentation
• pkg/workflow/js/create_project.cjs - Use helpers, normalize names, remove PROJECT_GITHUB_TOKEN
• pkg/workflow/js/create_project.test.cjs - Import generateCampaignId from helper

Files Added

• pkg/workflow/js/project_helpers.cjs - Shared helper functions
• pkg/workflow/js/project_helpers.test.cjs - Comprehensive test suite (28 tests)

Validation

• ✅ All tests pass (project_helpers: 28/28, create_project: 8/8)
• ✅ Code builds successfully
• ✅ Linting passes
• ✅ Formatting correct

Original prompt

Currently safe-output update-project also contains the logic to create a project if it does not exist. We want to split this to be consistent with the other safe-outputs granularity, so create a separate create-project and remove this logic from the current update-project.

---

✨ Let Copilot coding agent set things up for you — coding agent works faster and does higher quality work when set up for your repo.

[mnkiefer]

@pelikhan: As discussed yesterday, this splits the create-project from update-project. Please review before merging. 🙏🏼 Thank you!

[pelikhan]

Did you test it with dev.md ?

[mnkiefer]

Did you test it with dev.md ?

This would mean modifying dev to test the create & update project scenarios and pushing that to main, then selecting this branch for testing? So if anyone else is currently testing their stuff with dev, they would be blocked, no?

[pelikhan]

No

• you can trigger dev from the feature branch
• it is designed to be a scratch pad, no one should rely on it being stable in main

[pelikhan]

Additionally, we should have at least one active agent uses these in some way. I think issue monster could maybe create a project when it discovers a cluster with 10+ issues

[pelikhan]

The job failed silently. Needs to fail the job.

https://github.com/githubnext/gh-aw/actions/runs/20135501447/job/57787808209#step:4:1

[pelikhan]

Well known environement variables should be prefixed with GH_AW_...

[mnkiefer]

The job failed silently. Needs to fail the job.

https://github.com/githubnext/gh-aw/actions/runs/20135501447/job/57787808209#step:4:1

Yes, still working on it, will ping you when ready. 👍🏼

[pelikhan]

De-prioritized.