feat(autoware_euclidean_cluster)!: tier4_debug_msgs changed to autoware_internal_debug_msgs in autoware_euclidean_cluster

[vish0012]

Description

The tier4_debug_msgs have been replaced with autoware_internal_debug_msgs to enhance clarity and consistency in the codebase.

Related links

Parent Issue:

• Porting XXXStamped messages from tier4_autoware_msgs to autoware_internal_msgs autoware#5580

How was this PR tested?

Test are done in the following TIER IV internal evaluator:

https://evaluation.ci.tier4.jp/evaluation/reports/bfc0e074-207b-5ece-83e5-fb769f6f7272?project_id=prd_jt
https://evaluation.ci.tier4.jp/evaluation/reports/4df9332b-024e-5907-ada9-fbbcb8c20b3d?project_id=prd_jt
https://evaluation.ci.tier4.jp/evaluation/reports/ce1a0892-d8aa-5729-b25d-6d2d57bea034?project_id=prd_jt

Notes for reviewers

None.

Interface changes

Modifications

Same modification made to both euclidean cluster and voxel grid based euclidean cluster nodes.

Topic Type	Topic Name	Old Message Type	New Message Type
Pub	debug/cyclic_time_ms	tier4_debug_msgs/Float64Stamped	autoware_internal_debug_msgs/Float64Stamped
Pub	debug/processing_time_ms	tier4_debug_msgs/Float64Stamped	autoware_internal_debug_msgs/Float64Stamped
Pub	debug/pipeline_latency_ms	tier4_debug_msgs/Float64Stamped	autoware_internal_debug_msgs/Float64Stamped

Effects on system behavior

None.

[github-actions]

Thank you for contributing to the Autoware project!

🚧 If your pull request is in progress, switch it to draft mode.

Please ensure:

• You've checked our contribution guidelines.
• Your PR follows our pull request guidelines.
• All required CI checks pass before marking the PR ready for review.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 0% with 6 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 29.12%. Comparing base (f9c0aa6) to head (a4ba596).
Report is 51 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
...e_euclidean_cluster/src/euclidean_cluster_node.cpp	0.00%	3 Missing ⚠️
...er/src/voxel_grid_based_euclidean_cluster_node.cpp	0.00%	3 Missing ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #9873      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   29.14%   29.12%   -0.02%     
==========================================
  Files        1423     1426       +3     
  Lines      107820   107828       +8     
  Branches    42236    42246      +10     
==========================================
- Hits        31420    31406      -14     
- Misses      73358    73379      +21     
- Partials     3042     3043       +1     

Flag	Coverage Δ		*Carryforward flag
differential	4.08% <0.00%> (?)
differential-cuda	3.12% <0.00%> (?)
total	29.13% <ø> (-0.02%)	⬇️	Carriedforward from 74f6779

*This pull request uses carry forward flags. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[badai-nguyen]

LGTM

[Shin-kyoto]

@vish0012
Please fill "How was this PR tested?". You need to check this PR by running autoware.
Please fill "Interface changes"

[yukkysaito]

If the test results are entered and deemed appropriate, I will approve.

[mitsudome-r]

Test are done in the following TIER IV internal evaluator:

• https://evaluation.ci.tier4.jp/evaluation/reports/bfc0e074-207b-5ece-83e5-fb769f6f7272?project_id=prd_jt
• https://evaluation.ci.tier4.jp/evaluation/reports/4df9332b-024e-5907-ada9-fbbcb8c20b3d?project_id=prd_jt
• https://evaluation.ci.tier4.jp/evaluation/reports/ce1a0892-d8aa-5729-b25d-6d2d57bea034?project_id=prd_jt

[mitsudome-r]

@Shin-kyoto Interface info is updated and test is attached in above comment.

[Shin-kyoto]

LGTM

• I confirm that the content is good to merge and the test result shows this PR is properly tested to ensure it will not introduce any bugs.
• I did NOT check this PR by running autoware.

[mitsudome-r]

I have tested the PR with AWSIM and confirmed that the topic types were updated.