Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Create .coderabbit.yaml #62

Closed
wants to merge 2 commits into from
Closed

Conversation

Yashsharma1911
Copy link
Owner

@Yashsharma1911 Yashsharma1911 commented Nov 11, 2023

Added coderrabbit auto review AI

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features
    • Introduced a new configuration for code reviews, including path filters and instructions for Go code and Mocha tests.
  • Bug Fixes
    • Fixed a syntax error in the new loop iteration over the languages slice in the main function to prevent compilation errors.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Nov 11, 2023

Walkthrough

The changes introduced involve a new configuration for code reviews in .coderabbit.yaml and an addition of a for loop in Maps/main.go. However, the for loop contains a syntax error that could lead to a compilation issue.

Changes

File Change Summary
.coderabbit.yaml New configuration for code reviews, including path filters, Go code instructions, Mocha tests settings, auto review and chat auto-reply settings.
Maps/main.go Addition of a new for loop in the main function, iterating over the languages slice. However, a syntax error is present due to a missing underscore before value.

Poem

🍂 As autumn leaves fall, we code and tweak, 🍁

🐇 A rabbit hops, a syntax error to seek! 🕵️‍♂️

On this day, Armistice was signed, in history's peak, 🕊️

Let's fix our code, for the solution we seek! 💻🔍


Tips

Chat with CodeRabbit Bot (@coderabbitai)

  • If you reply to a review comment from CodeRabbit, the bot will automatically respond.
  • To engage with CodeRabbit bot directly around the specific lines of code in the PR, mention @coderabbitai in your review comment
  • Note: Review comments are made on code diffs or files, not on the PR overview.
  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger a review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Note: For conversation with the bot, please use the review comments on code diffs or files.

CodeRabbit Configration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • The JSON schema for the configuration file is available here.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/coderabbit-overrides.v2.json

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Review Status

Actionable comments generated: 0

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml

Commits Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 3e86ad2 and 161e72d.
Files selected for processing (1)
  • .coderabbit.yaml (1 hunks)
Additional comments: 1
.coderabbit.yaml (1)
  • 1-28: The configuration file looks good. It's well-structured and covers a wide range of settings for automated code reviews. However, ensure that the specified path filters and instructions align with your project structure and requirements. Also, verify that the ignored title keywords and base branches for auto review match your team's workflow.

@Yashsharma1911
Copy link
Owner Author

@coderabbitai does this configuration seems good?

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Nov 11, 2023

This is an invalid command. Please refer to the list of valid keywords below.

CodeRabbit Commands
  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger a review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

@Yashsharma1911
Copy link
Owner Author

@coderabbitai review

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Review Status

Actionable comments generated: 1

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml

Commits Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 161e72d and dac07a6.
Files selected for processing (1)
  • Maps/main.go (1 hunks)
Additional comments: 1
Maps/main.go (1)
  • 25-27: The loop is correct and will print all the values in the languages map.

Comment on lines +29 to +31
for _ value := range languages {
fmt.Printf("for key value is %v\n", value)
}
Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot Nov 11, 2023

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

There is a syntax error in the for loop. The underscore and value should be separated by a comma.

- for _ value := range languages {
+ for _, value := range languages {

Commitable suggestion

[!IMPORTANT]
Carefully review the code before committing. Make sure it correctly replaces the highlighted code, has no missing lines and indentaion issues.

Suggested change
for _ value := range languages {
fmt.Printf("for key value is %v\n", value)
}
for _, value := range languages {
fmt.Printf("for key value is %v\n", value)
}

Copy link
Owner Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@coderabbitai I don't know how to make changes can you suggest a solution?

Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@Yashsharma1911 Sure, I'd be happy to guide you through the process of making changes to your code. Here are the steps:

  1. Open the Maps/main.go file in your code editor.
  2. Locate the following lines of code:
for _ value := range languages {
    fmt.Printf("for key value is %v\n", value)
}
  1. Modify these lines to look like this:
for _, value := range languages {
    fmt.Printf("for key value is %v\n", value)
}
  1. Save the changes to the Maps/main.go file.
  2. Commit these changes with a descriptive message, for example: "Fixed syntax error in for loop".
  3. Push the changes to your branch.

This will update the pull request with your new changes. The underscore and value in the for loop should be separated by a comma. This is because in Go, the range keyword returns two values: the index and the value of the element at that index. If you don't need the index, you can ignore it with an underscore (_), but you still need to include the comma.

Let me know if you need further assistance!

Copy link
Owner Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Ohh thankyou

Copy link
Owner Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@coderabbitai I closed this PR

Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@Yashsharma1911 Understood, if you've closed the PR and do not need to make further changes, that's completely fine. If you decide to revisit the changes or need help with anything else in the future, feel free to reach out. Have a great day!

Copy link
Collaborator

@Harsh4902 Harsh4902 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@Yashsharma1911
Copy link
Owner Author

Thankyou @Harsh4902 I implemented this AI to give auto review in case we are not able to any contributor seems good to me too, I added this configuration file with mindset this AI need it though I don't think so I'm closing this PR as it is not required I guess

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants