Merged
Conversation
[experimental]
b02440d to
dd24991
Compare
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The cloud types in OpenFOAM have diverging API (especially when handing parcel data) hence no generic solution for cloud load balancing is possible. However this has been on the Backlog for some time, and I opted for the next best thing:
This PR also provides an alternative route for LB support: function objects. The aim is to make the load balancer more friendly to cases which already have a dynamic mesh type in effect (eg. mesh motion solvers... etc)
For now, this is highly experimental and will get merged only so progress on other fronts can accelerate.
The
particleInjection2Dtutorial case provides a basic exampleparallel-cloud-lb.mp4
While the
MPPICcolumncase showcases the integration of the function object into a mesh motion case:column.mp4