Skip to content

docs(leaderboard): add DeepSeek results - #286

Open
wilburx813 wants to merge 3 commits into
RLinf:mainfrom
wilburx813:docs/leaderboard-deepseek-main
Open

wilburx813 wants to merge 3 commits into
RLinf:mainfrom
wilburx813:docs/leaderboard-deepseek-main

Conversation

@wilburx813

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Add DeepSeek V4.1 results to the LIBERO-PRO leaderboard.

@read-the-docs-community

read-the-docs-community Bot commented Oct 15, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@read-the-docs-community

read-the-docs-community Bot commented Oct 15, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@wilburx813
wilburx813 marked this pull request as ready for review October 16, 2026 02:40
@chatgpt-codex-connector

chatgpt-codex-connector Bot commented Oct 16, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codex Review Summary

This comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.

Review Status Commit Review trigger
📝 Code Review ✅ Completed 2026-10-16T02:47:13.710124Z b99793d Draft marked ready
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review" or "@codex security review".

Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings.

@chatgpt-codex-connector chatgpt-codex-connector Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: b99793d5af

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

{"id": "robotwin--gpt-5-6-no-reasoning", "benchmark_id": "robotwin", "configuration_id": "gpt-5-6-no-reasoning", "mean_elapsed_seconds": 957.4, "total_output_tokens": 2456401},
{"id": "robotwin--gpt-6-astra-low", "benchmark_id": "robotwin", "configuration_id": "gpt-6-astra-low", "mean_elapsed_seconds": 1078.8, "total_output_tokens": 2763641}
{"id": "robotwin--gpt-6-astra-low", "benchmark_id": "robotwin", "configuration_id": "gpt-6-astra-low", "mean_elapsed_seconds": 1078.8, "total_output_tokens": 2763641},
{"id": "libero-pro--deepseek-v4-1-flash-xhigh", "benchmark_id": "libero-pro", "configuration_id": "deepseek-v4-1-flash-xhigh", "mean_elapsed_seconds": 963.25, "source_ids": ["deepseek-libero-pro-800-20261001"], "total_output_tokens": 5229711.52}

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

P1 Badge Put combined-token averages in the matching column

On the Time & Token Costs page, this key makes the renderers label 5,229,712 as “Total output tokens” (docs/_ext/leaderboard.py:41-42,293-296), but the new source note at line 883 says the value averages total_input_tokens + total_output_tokens across 800 episodes; the fractional value also cannot be a literal token total. This makes DeepSeek incomparable with adjacent output-only totals and misstates both the token scope and aggregation, so retain the supported mean_total_tokens field or replace the value with the actual integer output-token sum.

AGENTS.md reference: AGENTS.md:L5-L6

Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant