Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Use dual to take the dual of the domain when building symmetric operators #22

Open
wants to merge 3 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

mtfishman
Copy link
Member

@mtfishman mtfishman commented Feb 6, 2025

In combination with ITensor/NamedDimsArrays.jl#33, this makes sure the domain of the operator is properly dualed.

Todo:

  • Add tests.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Feb 6, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 67.40%. Comparing base (a9614a1) to head (e927615).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main      #22      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   69.50%   67.40%   -2.11%     
==========================================
  Files          13       13              
  Lines         551      540      -11     
==========================================
- Hits          383      364      -19     
- Misses        168      176       +8     
Flag Coverage Δ
docs 27.82% <0.00%> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@mtfishman mtfishman changed the title [WIP] Use dual to take the dual of the codomain when building symmetric operators [WIP] Use dual to take the dual of the domain when building symmetric operators Feb 6, 2025
@mtfishman mtfishman changed the title [WIP] Use dual to take the dual of the domain when building symmetric operators Use dual to take the dual of the domain when building symmetric operators Feb 6, 2025
@mtfishman mtfishman marked this pull request as ready for review February 6, 2025 20:05
@mtfishman mtfishman closed this Feb 7, 2025
@mtfishman mtfishman reopened this Feb 7, 2025
@mtfishman
Copy link
Member Author

The remaining test failures will be fixed by ITensor/TypeParameterAccessors.jl#26 and ITensor/BlockSparseArrays.jl#40.

@mtfishman mtfishman closed this Feb 9, 2025
@mtfishman mtfishman reopened this Feb 9, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant