Hi :)
I have tried the following methods with the KITTI data and I get exactly the same result in FLOAM and ISCLOAM. I have also evaluated the APE through evo and the result is the same.
I have taken into account what is described in #11 & #3 and I have tested it with:
[800,900,1000,1100,1200,1300,1400,1500,1600,1700,1800,1900,2000]
but in both methods I keep getting exactly the same value.
Hi :)
I have tried the following methods with the KITTI data and I get exactly the same result in FLOAM and ISCLOAM. I have also evaluated the APE through evo and the result is the same.
I have taken into account what is described in #11 & #3 and I have tested it with:
[800,900,1000,1100,1200,1300,1400,1500,1600,1700,1800,1900,2000]
but in both methods I keep getting exactly the same value.