Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fixing compatibility errors w/Gin and Windows. #3537

Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: v3-alpha
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

AnalogJ
Copy link

@AnalogJ AnalogJ commented Jun 14, 2024

😬 Sorry I haven't opened a issue about these yet. They've been living in my branch for more than 6months at this point, made sense to move them upstream

Description

  • The contentTypeSniffer struct is not compatible with the Gin response, which requires the http.CloseNotifier interface.
  • Fixing a parsing error for syso options.

Type of change

Please delete options that are not relevant.

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)

How Has This Been Tested?

Please describe the tests that you ran to verify your changes. Provide instructions so we can reproduce. Please also list any relevant details for your test configuration using wails doctor.

  • Windows
  • macOS

Test Configuration


                                
          Wails Doctor          
                                

                                                                                                                                                                            
# System
┌──────────────────────────────┐
| Name          | MacOS        |
| Version       | 12.6         |
| ID            | 21G115       |
| Branding      | Monterey     |
| Platform      | darwin       |
| Architecture  | arm64        |
| Apple Silicon | true         |
| CPU           | Apple M1 Max |
| CPU           | Unknown      |
| GPU           | Unknown      |
| Memory        | Unknown      |
└──────────────────────────────┘

# Build Environment
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
| Wails CLI    | v3.0.0-alpha.4                           |
| Go Version   | go1.22.4                                 |
| Revision     | ab06920e74473cb0e34bf2dfffdd8bda023f3ddc |
| Modified     | false                                    |
| -buildmode   | exe                                      |
| -compiler    | gc                                       |
| CGO_CFLAGS   |                                          |
| CGO_CPPFLAGS |                                          |
| CGO_CXXFLAGS |                                          |
| CGO_ENABLED  | 1                                        |
| CGO_LDFLAGS  |                                          |
| GOARCH       | arm64                                    |
| GOOS         | darwin                                   |
| vcs          | git                                      |
| vcs.modified | false                                    |
| vcs.revision | ab06920e74473cb0e34bf2dfffdd8bda023f3ddc |
| vcs.time     | 2024-06-08T22:28:38Z                     |
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘

# Dependencies
┌────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
| Xcode cli tools | 2395                                                 |
| npm             | 10.5.0                                               |
| *NSIS           | Not Installed. Install with `brew install makensis`. |
└─────────────────────── * - Optional Dependency ────────────────────────┘

# Diagnosis
 SUCCESS  Your system is ready for Wails development!

Checklist:

  • I have updated website/src/pages/changelog.mdx with details of this PR
  • My code follows the general coding style of this project
  • I have performed a self-review of my own code
  • I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
  • I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
  • My changes generate no new warnings
  • I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works
  • New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes

…ontentTypeSniffer, for Gin (and other framework) compatibility.
@leaanthony
Copy link
Member

Thanks for doing this. What's the parsing error?

@AnalogJ
Copy link
Author

AnalogJ commented Jun 15, 2024

honestly, I don't even know any more. The http.CloseNotifier interface is still an issue, but I'm not quite sure why those syso changes were required.

It must be related to my generate command, but I'm not sure.

wails3 generate syso -arch {{.ARCH}} -icon icon.ico -manifest wails.exe.manifest -info info.json -out ../wails.syso

@leaanthony
Copy link
Member

leaanthony commented Jun 15, 2024

Are you ok if we take out the syso change? That line currently works fine in the default template.
Please could you also add an entry to the changelog located at mkdocs-website/docs/changelog.md?
Do you have a publicly sharable example of the gin integration you are doing? Would love to write a guide on it 🙏

@AnalogJ
Copy link
Author

AnalogJ commented Jun 15, 2024

Done! ✅

  • removed the syso changes
  • Changelog entry

Do you have a publicly sharable example of the gin integration you are doing? Would love to write a guide on it 🙏

Unfortunately I don't, my desktop app is the paid version of my open-source fasten-onprem project.

But it's mostly just some custom setup and then calling:

	app := application.New(application.Options{
		Assets: application.AssetOptions{
			Middleware: FileServerMiddleware,
			Handler:    ginWebServerEngine.Handler(),
		},
		...
	}

@therealsamf
Copy link

Is this still in progress? I ran into same issue using echo and contentTypeSniffer not implementing http.Flusher interface.

The app panics here: https://github.com/labstack/echo/blob/master/response.go#L91

therealsamf added a commit to therealsamf/wails that referenced this pull request Aug 29, 2024
This is for echo & possibly other golang backend framework compatiblity.

See wailsapp#3537
@leaanthony
Copy link
Member

@therealsamf - Are you able to test this PR and confirm it works for your use case?

@leaanthony leaanthony added the awaiting feedback More information is required from the requestor label Nov 17, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Nov 17, 2024

Important

Review skipped

Auto reviews are disabled on base/target branches other than the default branch.

Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the .coderabbit.yaml file in this repository. To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@therealsamf
Copy link

@therealsamf - Are you able to test this PR and confirm it works for your use case?

I tested a portion of it and can confirm it works.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
awaiting feedback More information is required from the requestor
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants