Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Added validation examples. #195

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Aug 9, 2023
Merged

Added validation examples. #195

merged 4 commits into from
Aug 9, 2023

Conversation

andresuribe87
Copy link
Collaborator

@andresuribe87 andresuribe87 commented Aug 7, 2023

This aims to address #143 for VC claimsets (i.e. a VC without the proof piece being referenced.


Preview | Diff

Copy link
Collaborator

@decentralgabe decentralgabe left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think this is good to add. I would additionally link to the validation spec draft that would be used/followed for each example.

One thing I think we should do to make this easier to view is having a tabbed example viewer like this https://www.w3.org/TR/vc-data-model/#example-usage-of-the-type-property, you can see the respec code for it here https://github.com/w3c/vc-data-model/blob/main/REC/2022-03-03/index.html#L2525

@decentralgabe
Copy link
Collaborator

Also I would say #143 would not be fully addressed until we show examples with at least data integrity and having it packaged as a JWT

@andresuribe87
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@decentralgabe PTAL, should have addressed all the feedback.

@andresuribe87 andresuribe87 merged commit ede6ed7 into main Aug 9, 2023
@andresuribe87 andresuribe87 deleted the issue_143 branch August 9, 2023 14:16
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants