feat(nuxt): move to esm-only

[43081j]

Moves to an esm-only package now that all LTS other than 18.x (which is soon to fall out of LTS) support require(esm).

This is a draft until nuxt/module-builder 1.x becomes non-alpha

1.x outputs esm only, whereas 0.x outputs cjs too.

[netlify]

✅ Deploy Preview for pinia-official canceled.

Name	Link
🔨 Latest commit	e34635c
🔍 Latest deploy log	https://app.netlify.com/sites/pinia-official/deploys/67dae8b92f67500009b7bc2b

[43081j]

according to the nuxt module-builder docs:

types.d.ts: Exported types in addition to shims for nuxt.config auto completion.

but we don't reference that file anymore after this change.

maybe that's why the export had a separate types. in our case, though, types.d.ts just re-exports exactly what is in module.mjs

[pkg-pr-new]

Open in Stackblitz

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/@pinia/nuxt@2947

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/pinia@2947

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/@pinia/testing@2947

commit: e34635c

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 91.34%. Comparing base (d5bd162) to head (e34635c).
Report is 1 commits behind head on v3.

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##               v3    #2947   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   91.34%   91.34%           
=======================================
  Files          17       17           
  Lines        1398     1398           
  Branches      211      211           
=======================================
  Hits         1277     1277           
  Misses        120      120           
  Partials        1        1           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
• 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

[43081j]

@danielroe do you know when nuxt-builder alpha is planned to become stable?

wondering if we should use the alpha tag for now or just wait

[danielroe]

you should be safe to already use the alpha tag here - the only niggle is for modules that include Vue components in their runtime/.