[renovate]

This PR contains the following updates:

Update	Change
lockFileMaintenance	All locks refreshed

---

Warning

Some dependencies could not be looked up. Check the Dependency Dashboard for more information.

🔧 This Pull Request updates lock files to use the latest dependency versions.

---

Configuration

📅 Schedule: (UTC)

• Branch creation
  • Between 12:00 AM and 03:59 AM, only on Monday (* 0-3 * * 1)
• Automerge
  • At any time (no schedule defined)

🚦 Automerge: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied.

♻ Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

👻 Immortal: This PR will be recreated if closed unmerged. Get config help if that's undesired.

---

• If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

---

This PR was generated by Mend Renovate. View the repository job log.

[codspeed]

Merging this PR will regress 3 benchmarks

3 warnings, 1 note

⚠️ Walltime results may be unreliable

Some benchmarks used the Walltime instrument outside CodSpeed Macro Runners, which can make the results inconsistent.

Learn more about Macro Runners

See affected benchmarks

⚠️ Unable to measure the execution of 2 benchmarks

These benchmarks measured no execution time, so their results are not comparable and count as unchanged. This usually happens when the compiler removes the code under test.

Prevent compiler optimizations

See affected benchmarks

⚠️ 19 benchmarks are dominated by system calls

System calls cannot be simulated consistently and are left out of the measure. The reported value understates the real cost. Switch to the Walltime instrument to measure them.

Learn more about system calls

See affected benchmarks

ℹ️ 40 benchmarks have no flamegraph

The flamegraph wasn't generated: the symbols of the profiling trace could not be resolved, because no information about the language frames was collected.

See affected benchmarks

⚡ 19 improved benchmarks
❌ 3 regressed benchmarks
✅ 2417 untouched benchmarks
⏩ 166 skipped benchmarks¹

Warning

Please fix the performance issues or acknowledge them on CodSpeed.

Performance Changes

	Mode	Benchmark	BASE	HEAD	Efficiency
❌	CPU Simulation	chunked_dict_primitive_canonical_into[f64, (1000, 1000, 10)]	146.7 µs	200.6 µs	-26.84%
❌	CPU Simulation	encode_primitives[f32, (1000, 2)]	118.3 µs	146.6 µs	-19.35%
❌	CPU Simulation	compare[1]	111.6 µs	133.3 µs	-16.32%
⚡	Walltime	threshold_neon[8]	2.6 µs	1.3 µs	+92.51%
⚡	Walltime	threshold_neon[64]	3.8 µs	2.5 µs	+48.36%
⚡	CPU Simulation	bench_compare_varbin[(10000, 128)]	99.8 µs	70.3 µs	+41.93%
⚡	Walltime	threshold_neon[80]	4.8 µs	3.4 µs	+41.5%
⚡	Walltime	filter_neon[64]	2.4 µs	1.7 µs	+36.91%
⚡	CPU Simulation	bench_compare_varbin[(50000, 2)]	164 µs	123.3 µs	+33.02%
⚡	Walltime	filter_neon[8]	1,203 ns	929 ns	+29.49%
⚡	Walltime	starts_with_avx512[8, VarBinView]	86.7 µs	69.5 µs	+24.79%
⚡	Walltime	filter_neon[80]	3 µs	2.5 µs	+23.87%
⚡	CPU Simulation	bench_compare_varbin[(50000, 4)]	164.1 µs	134 µs	+22.53%
⚡	CPU Simulation	bench_compare_varbin[(50000, 8)]	165.1 µs	134.8 µs	+22.47%
⚡	CPU Simulation	bench_compare_varbin[(50000, 128)]	167.5 µs	136.8 µs	+22.38%
⚡	CPU Simulation	bench_compare_varbin[(50000, 32)]	165.1 µs	135.1 µs	+22.27%
⚡	CPU Simulation	bench_compare_sliced_dict_varbinview[(7500, 10000)]	230 µs	192.9 µs	+19.25%
⚡	CPU Simulation	bench_compare_sliced_dict_varbinview[(10000, 10000)]	236.2 µs	199.2 µs	+18.58%
⚡	CPU Simulation	compare[1]	154.7 µs	132.1 µs	+17.09%
⚡	CPU Simulation	bench_compare_varbin[(50000, 512)]	216.6 µs	186.2 µs	+16.33%
...	...	...	...	...	...

ℹ️ Only the first 20 benchmarks are displayed. Go to the app to view all benchmarks.

Tip

Investigate this regression by commenting @codspeedbot fix this regression on this PR, or directly use the CodSpeed MCP with your agent.

---

_{Comparing renovate/lock-file-maintenance-rust-lock-file-maintenance (10d4a82) with develop (db0c700)}

Footnotes

1. 166 benchmarks were skipped, so the baseline results were used instead. If they were deleted from the codebase, click here and archive them to remove them from the performance reports. ↩