-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 282
[Bugfix] Increase liveness failure threshold for crd #688
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
[Bugfix] Increase liveness failure threshold for crd #688
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Summary of Changes
Hello @zerofishnoodles, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!
This pull request addresses an issue where the liveness probe for the CRD (Custom Resource Definition) was failing when large models were in use. The change modifies a specific configuration parameter to provide more tolerance for startup or processing delays, ensuring the application remains stable and is not prematurely restarted due to transient unresponsiveness caused by model loading.
Highlights
- Liveness Probe Configuration: The FailureThreshold for the liveness probe in operator/internal/controller/vllmruntime_controller.go has been increased from 10 to 100. This change aims to prevent liveness probe failures when dealing with large models, allowing more time for the application to become responsive.
Using Gemini Code Assist
The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.
Invoking Gemini
You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command>
or @gemini-code-assist <command>
. Below is a summary of the supported commands.
Feature | Command | Description |
---|---|---|
Code Review | /gemini review |
Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state. |
Pull Request Summary | /gemini summary |
Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state. |
Comment | @gemini-code-assist | Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments. |
Help | /gemini help |
Displays a list of available commands. |
Customization
To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/
folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.
Limitations & Feedback
Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.
You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.
Footnotes
-
Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution. ↩
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Code Review
This pull request increases the liveness probe failure threshold from 10 to 100 to prevent pod restarts when loading large models. While this addresses the immediate problem, I've raised a concern that such a high threshold could mask real failures and delay recovery. I've suggested alternative approaches, such as increasing the initialDelaySeconds
for long startups, and making the probe settings configurable in the CRD for a more flexible long-term solution.
55865ce
to
b9e669c
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM. But I’m concerned that default.yaml might need frequent changes. Should we delete it from the codebase? cc @royyhuang
If this is actually just trying to resolve the model load time you should only need to do a startup probe and an initial delay seconds. The gemini warnings on this are quite good. Setting the liveness probe tolerance this high is similar to not having a liveness probe. |
@TheCodeWrangler This was trying to resolve the varied model load time since we encounter that for some model it only need several minutes, however for big models like qwen-480b and oss-120b, it takes around 30 minutes for model to load. |
b9e669c
to
4c0abbc
Compare
Signed-off-by: Rui Zhang <[email protected]>
4c0abbc
to
f37f51c
Compare
@Shaoting-Feng Could you please take a look at it? |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM. But I’m concerned that default.yaml might need frequent changes. Should we delete it from the codebase? I am not familiar with CRD so cc @YuhanLiu11
Increase liveness failure threshold for crd to solve that when the model is too big, the liveness probe fail.
FIX #xxxx (link existing issues this PR will resolve)
BEFORE SUBMITTING, PLEASE READ THE CHECKLIST BELOW AND FILL IN THE DESCRIPTION ABOVE
-s
when doinggit commit
[Bugfix]
,[Feat]
, and[CI]
.Detailed Checklist (Click to Expand)
Thank you for your contribution to production-stack! Before submitting the pull request, please ensure the PR meets the following criteria. This helps us maintain the code quality and improve the efficiency of the review process.
PR Title and Classification
Please try to classify PRs for easy understanding of the type of changes. The PR title is prefixed appropriately to indicate the type of change. Please use one of the following:
[Bugfix]
for bug fixes.[CI/Build]
for build or continuous integration improvements.[Doc]
for documentation fixes and improvements.[Feat]
for new features in the cluster (e.g., autoscaling, disaggregated prefill, etc.).[Router]
for changes to thevllm_router
(e.g., routing algorithm, router observability, etc.).[Misc]
for PRs that do not fit the above categories. Please use this sparingly.Note: If the PR spans more than one category, please include all relevant prefixes.
Code Quality
The PR need to meet the following code quality standards:
pre-commit
to format your code. SeeREADME.md
for installation.DCO and Signed-off-by
When contributing changes to this project, you must agree to the DCO. Commits must include a
Signed-off-by:
header which certifies agreement with the terms of the DCO.Using
-s
withgit commit
will automatically add this header.What to Expect for the Reviews
We aim to address all PRs in a timely manner. If no one reviews your PR within 5 days, please @-mention one of YuhanLiu11
, Shaoting-Feng or ApostaC.