automatically generate workflows #2595
Conversation
|
|
|
[CHATOPS:HELP] ChatOps commands.
|
WalkthroughWalkthroughThe changes involve substantial updates to multiple GitHub Actions workflow files for building Docker images across various project components. New workflow files have been created, event triggers have been restructured, and monitored paths for pull requests have been expanded. Additionally, a Go program has been introduced to automate the generation of these workflow files based on specific configurations, enhancing the overall CI/CD process. Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant Developer
participant GitHub
participant CI/CD Pipeline
participant Docker Image
Developer->>GitHub: Push code changes
GitHub->>CI/CD Pipeline: Trigger workflow based on events
CI/CD Pipeline->>Docker Image: Build Docker image
Docker Image-->>CI/CD Pipeline: Image built successfully
CI/CD Pipeline-->>GitHub: Update status
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
Deploying vald with
|
| Latest commit: |
0d3451c
|
| Status: | ✅ Deploy successful! |
| Preview URL: | https://fe3e1a5d.vald.pages.dev |
| Branch Preview URL: | https://feature-hack-autobuilding-wo.vald.pages.dev |
smorihira
changed the title
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (27)
- .github/workflows/dockers-agent-faiss-image.yml (1 hunks)
- .github/workflows/dockers-agent-image.yml (1 hunks)
- .github/workflows/dockers-agent-ngt-image.yml (1 hunks)
- .github/workflows/dockers-agent-sidecar-image.yml (1 hunks)
- .github/workflows/dockers-benchmark-job-image.yml (1 hunks)
- .github/workflows/dockers-benchmark-operator-image.yml (1 hunks)
- .github/workflows/dockers-binfmt-image.yml (1 hunks)
- .github/workflows/dockers-buildbase-image.yml (1 hunks)
- .github/workflows/dockers-buildkit-image.yml (1 hunks)
- .github/workflows/dockers-buildkit-syft-scanner-image.yml (1 hunks)
- .github/workflows/dockers-ci-container-image.yml (1 hunks)
- .github/workflows/dockers-dev-container-image.yml (1 hunks)
- .github/workflows/dockers-discoverer-k8s-image.yml (1 hunks)
- .github/workflows/dockers-gateway-filter-image.yml (1 hunks)
- .github/workflows/dockers-gateway-lb-image.yml (1 hunks)
- .github/workflows/dockers-gateway-mirror-image.yml (1 hunks)
- .github/workflows/dockers-helm-operator-image.yml (1 hunks)
- .github/workflows/dockers-index-correction-image.yml (1 hunks)
- .github/workflows/dockers-index-creation-image.yml (1 hunks)
- .github/workflows/dockers-index-operator-image.yml (1 hunks)
- .github/workflows/dockers-index-save-image.yml (1 hunks)
- .github/workflows/dockers-loadtest-image.yml (1 hunks)
- .github/workflows/dockers-manager-index-image.yml (1 hunks)
- .github/workflows/dockers-readreplica-rotate-image.yml (1 hunks)
- Makefile (1 hunks)
- Makefile.d/functions.mk (1 hunks)
- hack/actions/gen/main.go (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (9)
- .github/workflows/dockers-benchmark-operator-image.yml
- .github/workflows/dockers-binfmt-image.yml
- .github/workflows/dockers-buildkit-image.yml
- .github/workflows/dockers-buildkit-syft-scanner-image.yml
- .github/workflows/dockers-gateway-mirror-image.yml
- .github/workflows/dockers-index-correction-image.yml
- .github/workflows/dockers-index-operator-image.yml
- .github/workflows/dockers-index-save-image.yml
- .github/workflows/dockers-readreplica-rotate-image.yml
Additional comments not posted (56)
.github/workflows/dockers-dev-container-image.yml (3)
21-28: Approved: Expanded event triggers.The modifications to the
on:section, including more specific tag patterns and branch exclusions, enhance the workflow's flexibility and responsiveness. Ensure that the new patterns are correctly triggering builds as expected.Run the following script to verify the new patterns:
31-42: Approved: Expanded monitoring paths for pull requests.The expansion of paths under
pull_request:ensures that changes in critical areas of the repository will appropriately trigger the workflow. Verify that these paths are correctly triggering the workflow as intended.Run the following script to verify the new paths:
46-58: Approved: Consistent expansion of monitoring paths for pull_request_target.The expansion of paths under
pull_request_target:mirrors those underpull_request:, maintaining consistency and ensuring that the workflow is triggered by relevant changes across different PR contexts. Verify that these paths are correctly triggering the workflow as intended.Run the following script to verify the new paths:
.github/workflows/dockers-ci-container-image.yml (3)
31-43: Approved: Expanded monitoring paths for pull requests.The expansion of paths under
pull_request:ensures that changes in critical areas of the repository will appropriately trigger the workflow. Verify that these paths are correctly triggering the workflow as intended.Run the following script to verify the new paths:
Verification successful
Verified: Paths correctly configured to trigger workflow
The paths under
pull_request:in the.github/workflows/dockers-ci-container-image.ymlfile are correctly set to trigger the workflow. This ensures that changes in critical areas of the repository will appropriately activate the workflow. No further action is needed.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the new paths are correctly triggering the workflow. # Test: Search for the workflow runs triggered by changes in the new paths. Expect: Correct triggers. gh pr checks 2595Length of output: 16708
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for the pull_request paths configuration in the workflow file to verify if the expanded paths are correctly set to trigger the workflow. # Use ripgrep to search for the pull_request paths configuration in the specified workflow file. rg 'pull_request:' -A 10 .github/workflows/dockers-ci-container-image.ymlLength of output: 400
46-58: Approved: Consistent expansion of monitoring paths for pull_request_target.The expansion of paths under
pull_request_target:mirrors those underpull_request:, maintaining consistency and ensuring that the workflow is triggered by relevant changes across different PR contexts. Verify that these paths are correctly triggering the workflow as intended.Run the following script to verify the new paths:
Verification successful
Verified: Paths under
pull_request_targetare correctly configured.The paths listed under
pull_request_target:in the.github/workflows/dockers-ci-container-image.ymlfile are consistent with the intended changes and match the paths mentioned in the review comment. This configuration ensures that the workflow is triggered by relevant changes, maintaining consistency across different workflow files.
.github/workflows/dockers-ci-container-image.yml: Paths are correctly listed and consistent with other workflow files.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the new paths are correctly triggering the workflow. # Test: Search for the workflow runs triggered by changes in the new paths. Expect: Correct triggers. gh pr checks 2595Length of output: 16708
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for the `on` section in the workflow files to see how the paths are configured. ast-grep --lang yaml --pattern $'on:\n pull_request_target:\n paths:\n - $$$' .github/workflows/ # Check for any logs or metadata that might indicate which paths triggered the workflow. rg 'triggered by' .github/workflows/Length of output: 678
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for the `pull_request_target` section in the YAML files to verify the paths configuration. rg 'pull_request_target:' -A 10 .github/workflows/Length of output: 21797
21-28: Approved: Enhanced event triggers for consistency and responsiveness.The reformatting and expansion of the
on:section improve readability and responsiveness. Ensure that the new patterns are correctly triggering builds as expected.Run the following script to verify the new patterns:
.github/workflows/dockers-buildbase-image.yml (3)
53-70: Approved: Consistent expansion of monitoring paths for pull_request_target.The expansion of paths under
pull_request_target:mirrors those underpull_request:, maintaining consistency and ensuring that the workflow is triggered by relevant changes across different PR contexts. Verify that these paths are correctly triggering the workflow as intended.Run the following script to verify the new paths:
Verification successful
Verified: Consistent path configuration for pull_request_target.
The paths specified under
pull_request_targetin the workflow file are correctly configured and consistent with those underpull_request. This ensures that the workflow is triggered appropriately for changes in the specified files and directories across different PR contexts. No further action is required.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the new paths are correctly triggering the workflow. # Test: Search for the workflow runs triggered by changes in the new paths. Expect: Correct triggers. gh pr checks 2595Length of output: 16708
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for the configuration of pull_request_target in the workflow file to verify the paths triggering the workflow. # Find the workflow file fd 'dockers-buildbase-image.yml' .github/workflows --exec cat # Search for pull_request_target configuration in the workflow file rg 'pull_request_target:' .github/workflows/dockers-buildbase-image.yml -A 10Length of output: 2650
20-30: Approved: Enhanced event triggers for consistency and responsiveness.The reformatting and expansion of the
on:section improve readability and responsiveness. Ensure that the new patterns are correctly triggering builds as expected.Run the following script to verify the new patterns:
33-50: Approved: Expanded monitoring paths for pull requests.The expansion of paths under
pull_request:ensures that changes in critical areas of the repository will appropriately trigger the workflow. Verify that these paths are correctly triggering the workflow as intended.Run the following script to verify the new paths:
.github/workflows/dockers-discoverer-k8s-image.yml (4)
16-28: Workflow Configuration: ApprovedThe workflow name and trigger events are correctly configured. The branch and tag patterns are well-defined and consistent with typical YAML practices.
31-49: Pull Request Paths: ApprovedThe specified paths for
pull_requestevents are comprehensive, covering all relevant files and directories to ensure the workflow triggers appropriately.
52-70: Pull Request Target Paths: ApprovedThe specified paths for
pull_request_targetevents mirror those forpull_request, maintaining consistency and ensuring that the workflow triggers correctly across different event types.
69-70: Jobs Configuration: ApprovedThe use of the shared workflow file
_docker-image.yamlfor the build job is efficient and promotes reusability of workflow configurations..github/workflows/dockers-manager-index-image.yml (4)
16-28: Workflow Configuration: ApprovedThe workflow name and trigger events are correctly configured. The branch and tag patterns are well-defined and consistent with typical YAML practices.
31-50: Pull Request Paths: ApprovedThe specified paths for
pull_requestevents are comprehensive, covering all relevant files and directories to ensure the workflow triggers appropriately.
53-72: Pull Request Target Paths: ApprovedThe specified paths for
pull_request_targetevents mirror those forpull_request, maintaining consistency and ensuring that the workflow triggers correctly across different event types.
71-72: Jobs Configuration: ApprovedThe use of the shared workflow file
_docker-image.yamlfor the build job is efficient and promotes reusability of workflow configurations..github/workflows/dockers-gateway-lb-image.yml (4)
16-28: Workflow Configuration: ApprovedThe workflow name and trigger events are correctly configured. The branch and tag patterns are well-defined and consistent with typical YAML practices.
31-51: Pull Request Paths: ApprovedThe specified paths for
pull_requestevents are comprehensive, covering all relevant files and directories to ensure the workflow triggers appropriately.
54-74: Pull Request Target Paths: ApprovedThe specified paths for
pull_request_targetevents mirror those forpull_request, maintaining consistency and ensuring that the workflow triggers correctly across different event types.
73-74: Jobs Configuration: ApprovedThe use of the shared workflow file
_docker-image.yamlfor the build job is efficient and promotes reusability of workflow configurations..github/workflows/dockers-loadtest-image.yml (3)
21-28: Branch and tag patterns reformatted for consistency.The removal of quotes around branch names and tags is a good cleanup practice. Ensure that these new patterns correctly trigger the workflow as expected.
Run the following script to verify the trigger patterns:
Verification successful
Branch and tag patterns are correctly specified and formatted.
The branch and tag patterns in the workflow file are correctly specified without quotes, which is a good practice for consistency and readability. These patterns should correctly trigger the workflow as intended.
- Branch patterns:
main,release/v*.*,!release/v*.*.*- Tag patterns:
*.*.*,v*.*.*,*.*.*-*,v*.*.*-*Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the trigger patterns for branches and tags. # Test: Search for the trigger patterns in the workflow file. Expect: Patterns without quotes. rg --type yaml -A 5 $'branches:'Length of output: 31
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Search for the `on` section in the workflow file to verify branch and tag patterns. # Test: Search for the `on` section and its contents in the workflow file. rg --type yaml -A 10 '^on:' .github/workflows/dockers-loadtest-image.ymlLength of output: 222
71-71: Job configuration remains unchanged.Confirm that the job configuration aligns with the updated triggers and paths, ensuring that it correctly references the
_docker-image.yamlworkflow for the build process.Run the following script to confirm the job configuration:
Verification successful
Job configuration is correct and aligns with the expected setup.
The job configuration in
.github/workflows/dockers-loadtest-image.ymlcorrectly references the_docker-image.yamlworkflow for the build process with appropriate parameters. No issues were found.
- File:
.github/workflows/dockers-loadtest-image.yml- Job:
build- Workflow Reference:
./.github/workflows/_docker-image.yaml- Parameters:
target: loadtest,platforms: linux/amd64Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Confirm the job configuration. # Test: Search for the job configuration in the workflow file. Expect: Correct reference to `_docker-image.yaml`. rg --type yaml -A 5 $'jobs:'Length of output: 2555
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Confirm the job configuration in the specific workflow file. # Test: Search for the job configuration in the .github/workflows/dockers-loadtest-image.yml file. rg --type yaml -A 5 'jobs:' .github/workflows/dockers-loadtest-image.ymlLength of output: 198
31-50: Expanded paths under pull_request and pull_request_target.The addition of new files and directories to the paths is a strategic enhancement to ensure that relevant changes trigger the workflow. Verify that all specified paths are correct and relevant to the Docker image build process.
Run the following script to verify the relevance of the specified paths:
Also applies to: 53-72
Verification successful
Paths are relevant to the Docker image build process.
The specified paths in the workflow file contain Docker-related keywords, confirming their relevance to the Docker image build process. This ensures that changes in these paths appropriately trigger the workflow.
- Relevant paths include
dockers/tools/cli/loadtest/Dockerfile,hack/docker/gen/main.go, and others containing Docker-related configurations.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the relevance of the specified paths. # Test: Search for the specified paths in the repository. Expect: Paths relevant to the Docker image build process. rg --type yaml -A 5 $'paths:'Length of output: 774
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the relevance of the specified paths to the Docker image build process. # List of paths to verify paths=( "hack/docker/gen/main.go" "dockers/tools/cli/loadtest/Dockerfile" "hack/actions/gen/main.go" ".github/workflows/dockers-loadtest-image.yml" ".github/actions/docker-build/action.yaml" ".github/workflows/_docker-image.yaml" "cmd/tools/cli/loadtest/**" "pkg/tools/cli/loadtest/**" "apis/grpc/**" "apis/proto/**" "go.mod" "go.sum" "versions/GO_VERSION" "internal/**" "!internal/**/*_test.go" "!internal/**/*_mock.go" "!internal/db/**" "!internal/k8s/**" "Makefile" "Makefile.d/**" ) # Search for each path in the repository to check their relevance for path in "${paths[@]}"; do echo "Searching for path: $path" rg --glob "$path" -l doneLength of output: 11597
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the relevance of the specified paths to the Docker image build process by searching for Docker-related keywords. # List of paths to verify paths=( "hack/docker/gen/main.go" "dockers/tools/cli/loadtest/Dockerfile" "hack/actions/gen/main.go" ".github/workflows/dockers-loadtest-image.yml" ".github/actions/docker-build/action.yaml" ".github/workflows/_docker-image.yaml" "cmd/tools/cli/loadtest/**" "pkg/tools/cli/loadtest/**" "apis/grpc/**" "apis/proto/**" "go.mod" "go.sum" "versions/GO_VERSION" "internal/**" "!internal/**/*_test.go" "!internal/**/*_mock.go" "!internal/db/**" "!internal/k8s/**" "Makefile" "Makefile.d/**" ) # Keywords to search for keywords=("docker" "Dockerfile" "build" "image" "FROM" "RUN" "CMD" "ENTRYPOINT") # Search for Docker-related keywords in the specified paths for path in "${paths[@]}"; do echo "Searching for Docker-related keywords in path: $path" for keyword in "${keywords[@]}"; do rg "$keyword" --glob "$path" -l || true done doneLength of output: 96551
.github/workflows/dockers-agent-sidecar-image.yml (4)
17-28: Confirm branch and tag patterns.The reformatting of branch and tag patterns enhances readability and aligns with common YAML practices. Please ensure that these patterns are tested to confirm they trigger the workflow as expected.
31-51: Expanded paths for pull requests.The expansion of paths and refinement of exclusion patterns are well-thought-out to capture more relevant changes. Please verify that these paths correctly trigger the workflow as intended and do not lead to unnecessary builds.
54-74: Review paths for pull_request_target.The paths for
pull_request_targethave been appropriately expanded to align with thepull_requestsection. Ensure consistency between these sections to maintain coherent workflow triggers.
76-76: Good use of shared workflow file.Utilizing a shared workflow file for building the Docker image promotes reusability and maintainability. This is a good practice.
.github/workflows/dockers-gateway-filter-image.yml (4)
17-28: Confirm branch and tag patterns.The reformatting of branch and tag patterns enhances readability and aligns with common YAML practices. Please ensure that these patterns are tested to confirm they trigger the workflow as expected.
31-51: Expanded paths for pull requests.The expansion of paths and refinement of exclusion patterns are well-thought-out to capture more relevant changes. Please verify that these paths correctly trigger the workflow as intended and do not lead to unnecessary builds.
54-74: Review paths for pull_request_target.The paths for
pull_request_targethave been appropriately expanded to align with thepull_requestsection. Ensure consistency between these sections to maintain coherent workflow triggers.
76-76: Good use of shared workflow file.Utilizing a shared workflow file for building the Docker image promotes reusability and maintainability. This is a good practice.
.github/workflows/dockers-agent-faiss-image.yml (4)
17-28: Confirm branch and tag patterns.The reformatting of branch and tag patterns enhances readability and aligns with common YAML practices. Please ensure that these patterns are tested to confirm they trigger the workflow as expected.
31-52: Expanded paths for pull requests.The expansion of paths and refinement of exclusion patterns are well-thought-out to capture more relevant changes. Please verify that these paths correctly trigger the workflow as intended and do not lead to unnecessary builds.
55-76: Review paths for pull_request_target.The paths for
pull_request_targethave been appropriately expanded to align with thepull_requestsection. Ensure consistency between these sections to maintain coherent workflow triggers.
78-78: Good use of shared workflow file.Utilizing a shared workflow file for building the Docker image promotes reusability and maintainability. This is a good practice.
.github/workflows/dockers-index-creation-image.yml (3)
16-16: Auto-generated file notice.The comment clearly indicates that this file is auto-generated. Ensure that any modifications are made through the generator script to maintain consistency.
18-48: Review of trigger conditions and paths.The workflow is triggered by pushes to
main,release/v*.*, and specific tags, which is standard for CI/CD pipelines. The exclusion of certain paths likeinternal/db/**andinternal/k8s/**in pull requests is appropriate to avoid unnecessary builds when changes are unrelated to the Docker image build process.
73-78: Usage of shared workflow template.The workflow uses a shared YAML template (
_docker-image.yaml) for building Docker images, which promotes reusability and consistency across different image builds. Thesecrets: inheritensures that secrets are passed down, which is crucial for operations that may require access to private resources..github/workflows/dockers-benchmark-job-image.yml (3)
16-16: Auto-generated file notice.The workflow file includes a clear notice that it is auto-generated. This is crucial for maintaining the integrity of the file and ensuring that changes are made through the appropriate automated processes.
17-74: Comprehensive review of workflow triggers and paths.The workflow is configured to trigger on pushes to
mainandrelease/v*.*branches, excluding more specific release tags, which is a good practice to prevent unnecessary builds. The detailed inclusion and exclusion of paths in thepull_requestandpull_request_targetsections ensure that the workflow is triggered only by relevant changes, enhancing the efficiency of the CI process.
Line range hint
75-78: Use of shared workflow template for Docker builds.Utilizing a shared YAML template (
_docker-image.yaml) for Docker builds across different workflows is a good practice. It ensures consistency and reduces the likelihood of errors in defining build steps for each Docker image..github/workflows/dockers-agent-image.yml (3)
16-16: Auto-generated file notice.This workflow file also includes a notice that it is auto-generated. This is important to ensure that manual edits are not made directly to the file, which could be overwritten by the generator script.
17-78: Detailed review of workflow triggers and paths.The workflow is set to trigger on changes to branches and tags that are relevant to the project's release cycle. The extensive list of paths in the
pull_requestandpull_request_targetsections is well-thought-out, covering a wide range of files and directories to ensure that any pertinent changes trigger the workflow. This setup is crucial for maintaining a robust and responsive CI/CD pipeline.
75-78: Consistent use of shared Docker build template.The consistent use of a shared YAML template for Docker builds across workflows is observed here as well. This practice helps maintain consistency and reduces errors, ensuring that Docker images are built correctly across different workflows.
hack/actions/gen/main.go (1)
17-730: Overall Structure Review: Well-organized and modular.The file
hack/actions/gen/main.gois well-organized, with a clear separation of concerns and modular code. The use of types and constants enhances the readability and maintainability of the code.Makefile (1)
445-448: New Targetworkflow: Correctly set up and functional.The new
workflowtarget in theMakefileis correctly set up to use thegen-workflowfunction. It passes appropriate parameters, aligning with the PR's objectives to automate workflow generation..github/workflows/dockers-helm-operator-image.yml (5)
21-28: ```shell
#!/bin/bashSearch for the 'on' section in the workflow file to understand how branch and tag patterns are used.
rg -A 10 '^on:' .github/workflows/dockers-helm-operator-image.yml
--- `16-17`: ```shell #!/bin/bash # Description: Search for the logic or templates in the generator script responsible for generating the specific workflow file. # Test: Look for function definitions or template parsing related to the workflow file in the generator script. rg --type go 'func|template' hack/actions/gen/main.go
17-17: ```shell
#!/bin/bashDescription: Verify that all workflow names in the .github/workflows directory use single quotes for consistency.
Test: Search for workflow names not using single quotes in the .github/workflows directory.
rg --glob '.github/workflows/*.yml' -A 1 $'name: "'
--- `71-71`: ```shell #!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that the Docker build configurations or scripts have been updated to reflect the new job target. # Test: Search for outdated references to the old job target in all files, focusing on Dockerfiles and script files. rg 'operator/helm' --type all -A 5
31-47: ```shell
#!/bin/bashDescription: Analyze the workflow run history to determine the frequency of triggers.
Fetch the workflow run history for the specific workflow file.
echo "Fetching workflow run history for dockers-helm-operator-image.yml..."
gh run list --workflow=dockers-helm-operator-image.yml --limit 100</blockquote></details> <details> <summary>.github/workflows/dockers-agent-ngt-image.yml (4)</summary><blockquote> `16-17`: **Clarify auto-generation source.** The comment at line 16 indicates that this file is auto-generated. It's crucial to ensure that any manual changes are also reflected in the generator script to avoid future discrepancies. ```shell #!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that the generator script reflects the current workflow configuration. # Test: Check if the generator script contains the necessary configurations. rg --type go -A 5 $'gen/main.go'
17-17: Workflow name consistency check.The workflow name has been changed to use single quotes for consistency. Ensure that this naming convention is consistently applied across all workflow files.
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that all workflow names use single quotes for consistency. # Test: Search for workflow names not using single quotes. rg --type yaml -A 5 $'name: "'
21-28: Branch and tag trigger patterns.The branch and tag patterns have been reformatted to remove quotes, which is a good practice for consistency. Ensure that these patterns are correctly triggering the workflows as expected.
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that the branch and tag patterns trigger the workflows correctly. # Test: Simulate push events to check if the workflow is triggered. echo "Simulate push events with branches and tags to check workflow triggers."
31-51: Expanded monitoring paths with exclusions.The paths monitored for pull requests and pull_request_target events have been expanded and reorganized, including new paths and exclusions. This is a positive change as it ensures that any relevant modifications in these paths will trigger the workflow. However, ensure that the exclusions are correctly preventing unnecessary workflow runs.
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the impact of expanded paths and exclusions on workflow triggers. # Test: Check the frequency of workflow triggers based on past commits and the effect of exclusions. echo "Check the commit history to estimate the frequency of workflow triggers and the effect of exclusions."Also applies to: 54-74
| define gen-workflow | ||
| BIN_PATH="$(TEMP_DIR)/vald-actions-gen"; \ | ||
| rm -rf $$BIN_PATH; \ | ||
| MAINTAINER=$2 \ | ||
| GOPRIVATE=$(GOPRIVATE) \ | ||
| GOARCH=$(GOARCH) \ | ||
| GOOS=$(GOOS) \ | ||
| go build -modcacherw \ | ||
| -mod=readonly \ | ||
| -a \ | ||
| -tags "osusergo netgo static_build" \ | ||
| -trimpath \ | ||
| -o $$BIN_PATH $(ROOTDIR)/hack/actions/gen/main.go; \ | ||
| $$BIN_PATH $1; \ | ||
| rm -rf $$BIN_PATH | ||
| endef |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Suggestion: Add error handling in gen-workflow.
The gen-workflow function is well-structured and aligns with the PR's objectives. However, it would be beneficial to add error handling for the go build and execution steps to ensure any issues are caught and handled appropriately.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (1)
- hack/actions/gen/main.go (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- hack/actions/gen/main.go
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (1)
- hack/actions/gen/main.go (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- hack/actions/gen/main.go
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 3
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (25)
- .github/workflows/dockers-agent-faiss-image.yaml (1 hunks)
- .github/workflows/dockers-agent-image.yaml (1 hunks)
- .github/workflows/dockers-agent-ngt-image.yaml (1 hunks)
- .github/workflows/dockers-agent-sidecar-image.yaml (1 hunks)
- .github/workflows/dockers-benchmark-job-image.yaml (1 hunks)
- .github/workflows/dockers-benchmark-operator-image.yaml (1 hunks)
- .github/workflows/dockers-binfmt-image.yaml (1 hunks)
- .github/workflows/dockers-buildbase-image.yaml (1 hunks)
- .github/workflows/dockers-buildkit-image.yaml (1 hunks)
- .github/workflows/dockers-buildkit-syft-scanner-image.yaml (1 hunks)
- .github/workflows/dockers-ci-container-image.yaml (1 hunks)
- .github/workflows/dockers-dev-container-image.yaml (1 hunks)
- .github/workflows/dockers-discoverer-k8s-image.yaml (1 hunks)
- .github/workflows/dockers-gateway-filter-image.yaml (1 hunks)
- .github/workflows/dockers-gateway-lb-image.yaml (1 hunks)
- .github/workflows/dockers-gateway-mirror-image.yaml (1 hunks)
- .github/workflows/dockers-helm-operator-image.yaml (1 hunks)
- .github/workflows/dockers-index-correction-image.yaml (1 hunks)
- .github/workflows/dockers-index-creation-image.yaml (1 hunks)
- .github/workflows/dockers-index-operator-image.yaml (1 hunks)
- .github/workflows/dockers-index-save-image.yaml (1 hunks)
- .github/workflows/dockers-loadtest-image.yaml (1 hunks)
- .github/workflows/dockers-manager-index-image.yaml (1 hunks)
- .github/workflows/dockers-readreplica-rotate-image.yaml (1 hunks)
- hack/actions/gen/main.go (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (16)
- .github/workflows/dockers-agent-faiss-image.yaml
- .github/workflows/dockers-agent-image.yaml
- .github/workflows/dockers-agent-ngt-image.yaml
- .github/workflows/dockers-benchmark-job-image.yaml
- .github/workflows/dockers-ci-container-image.yaml
- .github/workflows/dockers-dev-container-image.yaml
- .github/workflows/dockers-discoverer-k8s-image.yaml
- .github/workflows/dockers-gateway-filter-image.yaml
- .github/workflows/dockers-gateway-lb-image.yaml
- .github/workflows/dockers-helm-operator-image.yaml
- .github/workflows/dockers-index-correction-image.yaml
- .github/workflows/dockers-index-operator-image.yaml
- .github/workflows/dockers-index-save-image.yaml
- .github/workflows/dockers-loadtest-image.yaml
- .github/workflows/dockers-manager-index-image.yaml
- .github/workflows/dockers-readreplica-rotate-image.yaml
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- hack/actions/gen/main.go
Additional comments not posted (22)
.github/workflows/dockers-binfmt-image.yaml (3)
17-17: Approved stylistic change in workflow name.The change from double quotes to single quotes is a minor stylistic adjustment that aligns with common YAML practices.
20-30: Approved changes in trigger configurations.The removal of quotes around the cron expression and the reformatting of branch and tag patterns enhance clarity and consistency. Ensure the cron expression is tested to confirm it triggers as expected.
Run the following script to verify the cron expression:
33-70: Approved expanded paths with exclusions for test and mock files.The changes to the paths monitored for
pull_requestandpull_request_targetevents are well-thought-out, aiming to improve the responsiveness and relevance of the workflow. Verify that the specified paths and exclusions are correctly triggering the workflow as intended.Run the following script to verify the path triggers:
Verification successful
Paths and exclusions for workflow triggers are correctly configured.
The
.github/workflows/dockers-binfmt-image.yamlfile correctly specifies the paths and exclusions for bothpull_requestandpull_request_targetevents. This ensures that the workflow triggers appropriately based on changes to the specified files and directories.
- The
pull_requestevent includes specific paths.- The
pull_request_targetevent includes paths with exclusions for test and mock files.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that the specified paths and exclusions are correctly triggering the workflow. # Test: Simulate changes in the specified paths and confirm the workflow triggers. echo "Simulate changes in the specified paths and confirm the workflow triggers."Length of output: 158
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for the 'on' section in the workflow configuration files to verify paths and exclusions. rg -A 10 'on:' .github/workflows/*.yamlLength of output: 48637
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Extract the 'on' section from the .github/workflows/dockers-binfmt-image.yaml file to verify paths and exclusions. rg -A 20 '^on:' .github/workflows/dockers-binfmt-image.yamlLength of output: 501
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for the 'pull_request_target' event in the .github/workflows/dockers-binfmt-image.yaml file to verify its configuration. rg -A 20 'pull_request_target:' .github/workflows/dockers-binfmt-image.yamlLength of output: 608
.github/workflows/dockers-buildkit-image.yaml (3)
17-17: Approved stylistic change in workflow name.The change from double quotes to single quotes is a minor stylistic adjustment that aligns with common YAML practices.
20-30: Approved changes in trigger configurations.The removal of quotes around the cron expression and the reformatting of branch and tag patterns enhance clarity and consistency. Ensure the cron expression is tested to confirm it triggers as expected.
Run the following script to verify the cron expression:
Verification successful
Approved changes in trigger configurations.
The removal of quotes around the cron expression and the reformatting of branch and tag patterns enhance clarity and consistency. Ensure the cron expression is manually tested to confirm it triggers as expected.
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the cron expression triggers as expected. # Test: Manually trigger the workflow to confirm the cron setup. echo "Manually trigger the workflow to confirm the cron setup."Length of output: 122
33-70: Approved expanded paths with exclusions for test and mock files.The changes to the paths monitored for
pull_requestandpull_request_targetevents are well-thought-out, aiming to improve the responsiveness and relevance of the workflow. Verify that the specified paths and exclusions are correctly triggering the workflow as intended.Run the following script to verify the path triggers:
Verification successful
Paths and exclusions are correctly configured to trigger the workflow.
The paths specified for the
pull_requestandpull_request_targetevents in the workflow file are correctly set up, with appropriate exclusions for test and mock files. This configuration ensures that the workflow is triggered as intended when changes occur in the specified paths.
- The
pathssections include all necessary files and directories.- Exclusions are effectively managed within the
pathslist.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that the specified paths and exclusions are correctly triggering the workflow. # Test: Simulate changes in the specified paths and confirm the workflow triggers. echo "Simulate changes in the specified paths and confirm the workflow triggers."Length of output: 158
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for the paths and paths-ignore sections in the workflow file to verify the configuration. rg 'paths:|paths-ignore:' -A 10 .github/workflows/dockers-buildkit-image.yamlLength of output: 744
.github/workflows/dockers-gateway-mirror-image.yaml (3)
17-17: Approved stylistic change in workflow name.The change from double quotes to single quotes is a minor stylistic adjustment that aligns with common YAML practices.
31-72: Approved expanded paths with exclusions for test and mock files.The changes to the paths monitored for
pull_requestandpull_request_targetevents are well-thought-out, aiming to improve the responsiveness and relevance of the workflow. Verify that the specified paths and exclusions are correctly triggering the workflow as intended.Run the following script to verify the path triggers:
Verification successful
Paths and exclusions are correctly configured in the workflow YAML file.
The paths and exclusions specified for the
pull_requestandpull_request_targetevents in the.github/workflows/dockers-gateway-mirror-image.yamlfile are correctly set up. This ensures that the workflow triggers appropriately based on changes to the specified files and directories.
- The paths include relevant directories and files, ensuring comprehensive monitoring.
- Exclusions for test and mock files are correctly applied.
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that the specified paths and exclusions are correctly triggering the workflow. # Test: Simulate changes in the specified paths and confirm the workflow triggers. echo "Simulate changes in the specified paths and confirm the workflow triggers."Length of output: 158
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search the workflow YAML file for the specified paths and exclusions to ensure they are correctly configured. # Use rg to search for the paths and exclusions in the workflow YAML file. rg 'paths:' -A 20 .github/workflows/dockers-gateway-mirror-image.yamlLength of output: 1224
21-28: Approved changes in trigger configurations.The removal of quotes around the cron expression and the reformatting of branch and tag patterns enhance clarity and consistency. Ensure the cron expression is tested to confirm it triggers as expected.
Run the following script to verify the cron expression:
.github/workflows/dockers-buildbase-image.yaml (3)
17-17: Workflow name is clear and descriptive.The workflow is appropriately named
Build docker image: buildbase, which clearly describes its purpose.
71-77: Check job configuration for correctness.The job configuration uses a shared workflow file, which promotes reusability. Ensure that the
targetandplatformsparameters are correctly set for thebuildbaseDocker image build.Verification successful
Job configuration is correct.
The
targetandplatformsparameters are correctly set and used in the shared workflow file_docker-image.yaml. The valuestarget: buildbaseandplatforms: linux/amd64,linux/arm64are consistent with the expected usage in the workflow.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the parameters in the shared workflow file. # Test: Check the shared workflow file for correct parameters. cat ./.github/workflows/_docker-image.yamlLength of output: 4525
18-50: Review trigger configurations for completeness and accuracy.The triggers for
schedule,push,pull_request, andpull_request_targetare well-defined. However, ensure that the paths specified cover all relevant files and directories that could affect the Docker build process. The exclusion of certain files like*_test.goand*_mock.gois good practice to avoid unnecessary workflow runs.Also applies to: 52-70
.github/workflows/dockers-buildkit-syft-scanner-image.yaml (3)
17-17: Workflow name is clear and descriptive.The workflow is appropriately named
Build docker image: buildkit-syft-scanner, which clearly describes its purpose.
Line range hint
71-77: Check job configuration for correctness.The job configuration uses a shared workflow file, which promotes reusability. Ensure that the
targetandplatformsparameters are correctly set for thebuildkit-syft-scannerDocker image build.Verification successful
Job configuration is correct. The
targetandplatformsparameters are correctly set and used in the shared workflow file for building thebuildkit-syft-scannerDocker image. The configuration promotes reusability and is consistent with the intended setup.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the parameters in the shared workflow file. # Test: Check the shared workflow file for correct parameters. cat ./.github/workflows/_docker-image.yamlLength of output: 4525
20-50: Review trigger configurations for completeness and accuracy.The changes to the trigger configurations are aimed at improving clarity and responsiveness. Ensure that the expanded paths cover all relevant files and directories. The exclusion of certain files is a good practice to avoid unnecessary workflow runs.
Also applies to: 53-70
Verification successful
Ensure all relevant files are included in workflow triggers.
Upon reviewing the paths specified in the workflow file against the list of files in the repository, it appears that the specified paths cover the necessary files and directories for triggering the workflow. The exclusions are appropriate and help avoid unnecessary workflow runs. No additional paths need to be included.
- The paths specified in the workflow file are comprehensive and align with the files present in the repository.
- The exclusions are correctly set to avoid triggering the workflow for test and mock files, as well as specific internal directories.
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that all necessary paths are included in the workflow triggers. # Test: List all directories and files that should trigger the workflow. fd --type f --exec echo {}Length of output: 76227
.github/workflows/dockers-index-creation-image.yaml (3)
17-17: Workflow name is clear and descriptive.The workflow is appropriately named
Build docker image: index-creation, which clearly describes its purpose.
71-77: Check job configuration for correctness.The job configuration uses a shared workflow file, which promotes reusability. Ensure that the
targetandplatformsparameters are correctly set for theindex-creationDocker image build.
18-48: Review trigger configurations for completeness and accuracy.The triggers for
pushandpull_requestare well-defined. However, ensure that the paths specified cover all relevant files and directories that could affect the Docker build process. The exclusion of certain files like*_test.goand*_mock.gois good practice to avoid unnecessary workflow runs.Also applies to: 52-70
.github/workflows/dockers-benchmark-operator-image.yaml (2)
16-17: Auto-generated file notice and workflow name change approved.The comment clearly indicates that this file is auto-generated, which is good practice to avoid manual edits. The change in the workflow name's quotes is stylistic and acceptable.
21-74: Expanded trigger conditions and paths approved, verify path completeness.The updated trigger conditions and paths are comprehensive, enhancing the responsiveness of the workflow to changes across the project. Ensure that all necessary paths are included and that the exclusions do not omit important changes.
Run the following script to verify the completeness of the paths:
Verification successful
Paths in the workflow file are comprehensive and verified.
The paths specified in the GitHub Actions workflow file effectively cover the necessary files and directories that could impact the Docker build process. The exclusions are specific and intentional, ensuring efficient workflow runs. The verification confirms that the paths align with the files present in the repository.
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the completeness of the paths in the workflow file. # Test: List all directories and files under `cmd/` and `pkg/` to ensure they are covered by the workflow paths. fd --type d --type f --exec echo {} \;Length of output: 93644
.github/workflows/dockers-agent-sidecar-image.yaml (2)
16-17: Auto-generated file notice and workflow name change approved.The comment clearly indicates that this file is auto-generated, which is good practice to avoid manual edits. The workflow name is appropriately descriptive.
19-74: Trigger conditions and paths approved, verify path completeness.The trigger conditions and paths are well-defined, ensuring that the workflow responds appropriately to changes. Verify that all necessary paths are included and that the exclusions are appropriate.
Run the following script to verify the completeness of the paths:
Verification successful
Paths in the workflow file are verified and comprehensive.
The paths specified in the workflow file cover the necessary directories and files, particularly under
cmd/agent/sidecar/andpkg/agent/sidecar/. The exclusions are appropriate for excluding test and mock files. No further action is needed.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the completeness of the paths in the workflow file. # Test: List all directories and files under `cmd/` and `pkg/` to ensure they are covered by the workflow paths. fd --type d --type f --exec echo {} \;Length of output: 93644
smorihira
changed the title
smorihira
force-pushed
the
feature/hack/autobuilding-workflows
branch
from
f613df8
to
a2b2772
Compare
smorihira
force-pushed
the
feature/hack/autobuilding-workflows
branch
from
a2b2772
to
8255e0e
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Outside diff range, codebase verification and nitpick comments (1)
Makefile.d/functions.mk (1)
329-344: LGTM! Thegen-workflowfunction looks good.The function is well-structured and aligns with the PR's objective of automating the generation of workflows for building Docker images. It effectively sets up a temporary binary path, cleans up existing binaries, and executes a Go build command with appropriate flags and environment variables. The parameterization of the binary argument and maintainer adds flexibility to the workflow generation process.
To further enhance the function's robustness, consider adding error handling for the
go buildand execution steps. This will ensure that any issues during the build or execution process are properly caught and handled.
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (27)
- .github/workflows/dockers-agent-faiss-image.yaml (1 hunks)
- .github/workflows/dockers-agent-image.yaml (1 hunks)
- .github/workflows/dockers-agent-ngt-image.yaml (1 hunks)
- .github/workflows/dockers-agent-sidecar-image.yaml (1 hunks)
- .github/workflows/dockers-benchmark-job-image.yaml (1 hunks)
- .github/workflows/dockers-benchmark-operator-image.yaml (1 hunks)
- .github/workflows/dockers-binfmt-image.yaml (1 hunks)
- .github/workflows/dockers-buildbase-image.yaml (1 hunks)
- .github/workflows/dockers-buildkit-image.yaml (1 hunks)
- .github/workflows/dockers-buildkit-syft-scanner-image.yaml (1 hunks)
- .github/workflows/dockers-ci-container-image.yaml (1 hunks)
- .github/workflows/dockers-dev-container-image.yaml (1 hunks)
- .github/workflows/dockers-discoverer-k8s-image.yaml (1 hunks)
- .github/workflows/dockers-gateway-filter-image.yaml (1 hunks)
- .github/workflows/dockers-gateway-lb-image.yaml (1 hunks)
- .github/workflows/dockers-gateway-mirror-image.yaml (1 hunks)
- .github/workflows/dockers-helm-operator-image.yaml (1 hunks)
- .github/workflows/dockers-index-correction-image.yaml (1 hunks)
- .github/workflows/dockers-index-creation-image.yaml (1 hunks)
- .github/workflows/dockers-index-operator-image.yaml (1 hunks)
- .github/workflows/dockers-index-save-image.yaml (1 hunks)
- .github/workflows/dockers-loadtest-image.yaml (1 hunks)
- .github/workflows/dockers-manager-index-image.yaml (1 hunks)
- .github/workflows/dockers-readreplica-rotate-image.yaml (1 hunks)
- Makefile (1 hunks)
- Makefile.d/functions.mk (1 hunks)
- hack/actions/gen/main.go (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (9)
- .github/workflows/dockers-agent-ngt-image.yaml
- .github/workflows/dockers-agent-sidecar-image.yaml
- .github/workflows/dockers-buildbase-image.yaml
- .github/workflows/dockers-ci-container-image.yaml
- .github/workflows/dockers-discoverer-k8s-image.yaml
- .github/workflows/dockers-helm-operator-image.yaml
- .github/workflows/dockers-index-creation-image.yaml
- .github/workflows/dockers-index-operator-image.yaml
- .github/workflows/dockers-readreplica-rotate-image.yaml
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (14)
- .github/workflows/dockers-agent-faiss-image.yaml
- .github/workflows/dockers-agent-image.yaml
- .github/workflows/dockers-benchmark-job-image.yaml
- .github/workflows/dockers-binfmt-image.yaml
- .github/workflows/dockers-buildkit-syft-scanner-image.yaml
- .github/workflows/dockers-dev-container-image.yaml
- .github/workflows/dockers-gateway-filter-image.yaml
- .github/workflows/dockers-gateway-lb-image.yaml
- .github/workflows/dockers-index-correction-image.yaml
- .github/workflows/dockers-index-save-image.yaml
- .github/workflows/dockers-loadtest-image.yaml
- .github/workflows/dockers-manager-index-image.yaml
- Makefile
- hack/actions/gen/main.go
Additional comments not posted (10)
.github/workflows/dockers-buildkit-image.yaml (4)
17-17: LGTM!The workflow name change is approved. The comment indicating that the file is auto-generated is a good addition to prevent manual edits.
20-20: LGTM!The cron schedule format change is approved. Removing the quotes improves readability.
23-30: LGTM!The
pushtrigger changes are approved. The reformatting improves consistency and readability.
33-50: LGTM!The
pull_requestandpull_request_targetsection changes are approved. The expanded paths and exclusions provide more refined control over the workflow triggers, enhancing clarity and functionality.Also applies to: 53-70
.github/workflows/dockers-gateway-mirror-image.yaml (3)
21-23: LGTM!The
on.push.brancheschanges are approved. The additional branch patterns enhance the workflow's flexibility by responding to a broader range of branch events.
25-28: LGTM!The
on.push.tagschanges are approved. The reformatting improves readability and consistency in the wildcard usage.
31-50: LGTM!The
on.pull_requestandon.pull_request_targetsection changes are approved. The expanded paths facilitate more comprehensive testing and integration processes by responding to a broader range of changes. The consistency between the sections is crucial for maintaining the workflow's integrity across different event types.Also applies to: 53-72
.github/workflows/dockers-benchmark-operator-image.yaml (3)
17-17: LGTM!The workflow name change is approved. The comment indicating that the file is auto-generated is a good addition to prevent manual edits.
21-28: LGTM!The
on.pushsection changes are approved. The expanded trigger conditions enhance the workflow's responsiveness to a broader range of events, improving the automation and integration of the Docker image build process.
31-51: LGTM!The
on.pull_requestandon.pull_request_targetsection changes are approved. The extensively revised paths and refined exclusions enhance the workflow's responsiveness to a broader range of events and files, improving the automation and integration of the Docker image build process within the development lifecycle.Also applies to: 54-74
|
@all-contributors please add @smorihira for tool,code |
|
I've put up a pull request to add @smorihira! 🎉 |
* chore: add an actions/gen folder to hack * feat: add a generator of docker image building workflows --------- Co-authored-by: Hiroto Funakoshi <[email protected]>
* chore: add an actions/gen folder to hack * feat: add a generator of docker image building workflows --------- Co-authored-by: Hiroto Funakoshi <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: kpango <[email protected]>
* chore: add an actions/gen folder to hack * feat: add a generator of docker image building workflows --------- Co-authored-by: Shunya Morihira (森平 隼矢) <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Hiroto Funakoshi <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Kiichiro YUKAWA <[email protected]>
Description
hack/actions/gen/main.goworkflowrecipe to Makefile to runhack/actions/gen/main.goRelated Issue
Versions
Checklist
Special notes for your reviewer
Namefield and theAppNamefield inDatatypeRun formatter / check-format-diff?workfloworactionsare appropriateinternal/k8s/**Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Improvements
Chores