Skip to content

Conversation

@agileago
Copy link

@agileago agileago commented Nov 26, 2025

image

钉钉安卓返回长这样。。。。

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Bug Fixes
    • Fixed response header processing to ensure compatibility with DingTalk Android format, allowing headers to be properly handled in the request workflow.

✏️ Tip: You can customize this high-level summary in your review settings.

@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Nov 26, 2025

Walkthrough

A compatibility fix added to the request handler to detect when result.header is an array (produced by DingTalk Android) and merge it into a single object before constructing AxiosHeaders, while preserving the existing response handling flow.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Summary
Header array compatibility
src/methods/request.ts
Added conditional logic to detect array-format headers and merge them into an object for DingTalk Android compatibility

Estimated code review effort

🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~8 minutes

  • Focus area: Verify the array-to-object merge logic correctly preserves all header values and doesn't conflict with existing AxiosHeaders construction

Poem

A DingTalk array danced out of line,
Headers arranged in formats unkind,
With a merge and a hop, the rabbit fixed it right,
Now compatibility shines ever bright! 🐰✨

Pre-merge checks and finishing touches

✅ Passed checks (3 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Description Check ✅ Passed Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check ✅ Passed The title accurately describes the main change: adding compatibility for DingTalk Android's header format in the request handler.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.
✨ Finishing touches
  • 📝 Generate docstrings
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment

Tip

📝 Customizable high-level summaries are now available in beta!

You can now customize how CodeRabbit generates the high-level summary in your pull requests — including its content, structure, tone, and formatting.

  • Provide your own instructions using the high_level_summary_instructions setting.
  • Format the summary however you like (bullet lists, tables, multi-section layouts, contributor stats, etc.).
  • Use high_level_summary_in_walkthrough to move the summary from the description to the walkthrough section.

Example instruction:

"Divide the high-level summary into five sections:

  1. 📝 Description — Summarize the main change in 50–60 words, explaining what was done.
  2. 📓 References — List relevant issues, discussions, documentation, or related PRs.
  3. 📦 Dependencies & Requirements — Mention any new/updated dependencies, environment variable changes, or configuration updates.
  4. 📊 Contributor Summary — Include a Markdown table showing contributions:
    | Contributor | Lines Added | Lines Removed | Files Changed |
  5. ✔️ Additional Notes — Add any extra reviewer context.
    Keep each section concise (under 200 words) and use bullet or numbered lists for clarity."

Note: This feature is currently in beta for Pro-tier users, and pricing will be announced later.


Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
src/methods/request.ts (1)

23-29: DingTalk header normalization logic is sound; consider minor typing/robustness tweaks

The new handling for array-shaped headers works and keeps the existing flow intact. To make it a bit more robust and TS-friendly, you could (optionally) add an explicit type for dingHeader and guard against non-object entries in the array:

-        // 兼容钉钉安卓返回的header格式
-        if (Array.isArray(result.header)) {
-          const dingHeader = {}
-          result.header.forEach(h => Object.assign(dingHeader, h))
-          result.header = dingHeader
-        }
+        // 兼容钉钉安卓返回的 header 格式
+        if (Array.isArray(result.header)) {
+          const dingHeader: Record<string, any> = {}
+          result.header.forEach((h) => {
+            if (h && typeof h === 'object')
+              Object.assign(dingHeader, h)
+          })
+          result.header = dingHeader
+        }
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between eebed3f and 4639568.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • src/methods/request.ts (1 hunks)

@KeJunMao
Copy link
Member

@ModyQyW 是否应该在库层面抹平差异呀?

@agileago
Copy link
Author

等官方得何年了

@ModyQyW
Copy link
Member

ModyQyW commented Dec 1, 2025

image 我是不想给官方擦屁股,很容易变成库侧全堆屎……

@agileago
Copy link
Author

agileago commented Dec 1, 2025

image

😄

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants