Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Feat/al2 old dockerfile #1204

Draft
wants to merge 28 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
Draft

Feat/al2 old dockerfile #1204

wants to merge 28 commits into from

Conversation

nss10
Copy link
Contributor

@nss10 nss10 commented Nov 22, 2024

Link to JIRA ticket if there is one:

New Features

Breaking Changes

Bug Fixes

Improvements

Dependency updates

Deployment changes

@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented Nov 22, 2024

Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 12262743439

Details

  • 0 of 0 changed or added relevant lines in 0 files are covered.
  • 105 unchanged lines in 6 files lost coverage.
  • Overall coverage increased (+0.09%) to 75.334%

Files with Coverage Reduction New Missed Lines %
blueprints/data/indexd.py 1 94.36%
auth.py 7 87.9%
jwt/keys.py 12 78.95%
resources/admin/admin_users.py 14 84.36%
resources/user/init.py 21 60.15%
blueprints/admin.py 50 72.43%
Totals Coverage Status
Change from base Build 11939942374: 0.09%
Covered Lines: 7837
Relevant Lines: 10403

💛 - Coveralls

"missing public key file; expected file to exist: " + pub_filepath
)
# Generate public key from private key
with open(prv_filepath, "r") as f:
Copy link
Contributor

@Avantol13 Avantol13 Dec 11, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

why are we doing this in the Python code during runtime? Can we just require that the public key be provided like before?

AlbertSnows
AlbertSnows previously approved these changes Dec 11, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

@AlbertSnows AlbertSnows left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Approved assuming the pipeline issues are resolved. can you add a description to the PR so I or other reviewers have a better understanding of the purposes of these changes? I don't see any glaring issues, but I highly recommend getting more eyes just in case.

Copy link

Please find the ci env pod logs here

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants