Fix produce mutex to allow variables to be updated in blocking condition #917
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
We have hit this bug franz-go leaking whole lot of goroutines where we call produce without cancel from a spawned goroutine for each. Looking through the code, having mutex open prevents other goroutines to update variables the wait condition is reading on. Cause both
quit, overMaxRecs, overBytes
all depends onp.mu
. Also looks like condition Wait also missing locks required by its semantics.However, now this concurrency code looks fairly unnatural, might be better to re-write it eventually. It's likely hard to make a test to reproduce it in github actions environment that might have very limited actual cpu parallelism, I tried setting a high GOMAXPROCS but it still is passing with/without changes.
Issue #918