fix: suppress Pulsar C++ client log noise#936
Merged
Conversation
Contributor License Agreement ✅All contributors have signed the CLA. Thank you! |
Revert consumer receive timeout from 100ms back to the original 2000ms. The 100ms change was based on a misunderstanding — receive() is a blocking call that returns immediately when a message arrives, so the timeout only affects how quickly a consumer checks the shutdown flag during idle periods. 100ms generated ~200 WARN lines/sec from the C++ client with no latency benefit. Also set the Pulsar C++ client logger to Error level so residual timeout warnings from the subscriber (250ms) don't produce noise. Update poll timeout test to match reverted 2000ms value
01288fc to
2dd8ddc
Compare
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Revert consumer receive timeout from 100ms back to the original 2000ms. The 100ms change was based on a misunderstanding — receive() is a blocking call that returns immediately when a message arrives, so the timeout only affects how quickly a consumer checks the shutdown flag during idle periods. 100ms generated ~200 WARN lines/sec from the C++ client with no latency benefit.
Also set the Pulsar C++ client logger to Error level so residual timeout warnings from the subscriber (250ms) don't produce noise.