Skip to content

⚡ Bolt: Add sync.Pool for ResponseWriterWrapper to reduce allocations - #395

Open
rschumann wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
bolt-responsewriter-pool-3584162418113591430
Open

⚡ Bolt: Add sync.Pool for ResponseWriterWrapper to reduce allocations#395
rschumann wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
bolt-responsewriter-pool-3584162418113591430

Conversation

@rschumann

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

💡 What: Implemented sync.Pool to recycle ResponseWriterWrapper objects during API request logging.
🎯 Why: To eliminate repeated memory allocations for this struct on every API gateway request.
📊 Impact: Benchmark results indicate allocations per operation dropped from 5 allocs to 1, and ns/op dropped from ~500 to ~150.
🔬 Measurement: Verify via benchmarking ResponseWriterWrapper creation.


PR created automatically by Jules for task 3584162418113591430 started by @rschumann

Co-authored-by: rschumann <360788+rschumann@users.noreply.github.com>
@google-labs-jules

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

👋 Jules, reporting for duty! I'm here to lend a hand with this pull request.

When you start a review, I'll add a 👀 emoji to each comment to let you know I've read it. I'll focus on feedback directed at me and will do my best to stay out of conversations between you and other bots or reviewers to keep the noise down.

I'll push a commit with your requested changes shortly after. Please note there might be a delay between these steps, but rest assured I'm on the job!

For more direct control, you can switch me to Reactive Mode. When this mode is on, I will only act on comments where you specifically mention me with @jules. You can find this option in the Pull Request section of your global Jules UI settings. You can always switch back!

New to Jules? Learn more at jules.google/docs.


For security, I will only act on instructions from the user who triggered this task.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant