Skip to content

Conversation

@fakela
Copy link
Contributor

@fakela fakela commented Oct 18, 2025

Converted the TVM whitepaper from the original LaTeX source (tvm.tex) to Markdown.
This version replaces the earlier PDF-based conversion.

Closes the following:
#118
#651

Known differences (to be fixed in future releases):

@fakela fakela changed the title Convert tvm latex to whitepaper Convert tvm latex to web whitepaper v2 Oct 20, 2025
@fakela fakela marked this pull request as draft October 20, 2025 10:00
@fakela
Copy link
Contributor Author

fakela commented Oct 23, 2025

@reveloper I used the same format to review this and checking the text, math expressions, code etc. The only issue I had with this is the way to render HASH as i mentioned in the tblkch

@fakela
Copy link
Contributor Author

fakela commented Oct 31, 2025

I listed the differences with the "need fix" and "ok" checkboxes.

  1. Differences in quotes
Screenshot 2025-10-31 at 01 12 27
  • Need fix
  • Ok
  1. Differences in LVL, the text render used lvl
Screenshot 2025-10-31 at 01 14 10
  • Need fix
  • Ok

3 . Differences in quotes

Screenshot 2025-10-31 at 01 02 29
  • Need fix
  • Ok
  1. I kept this true to the latex by not adding backticks is it okay or should i add backticks @reveloper
Screenshot 2025-11-10 at 00 07 45

@fakela fakela marked this pull request as ready for review November 3, 2025 00:49
@verytactical
Copy link
Collaborator

Please fix CI.

image

@verytactical verytactical marked this pull request as draft November 4, 2025 16:16
@reveloper reveloper added the 3p Reviewed by someone else. Used for filtering PRs. Don't mind this. label Nov 7, 2025
@fakela fakela marked this pull request as ready for review November 10, 2025 00:13
@reveloper reveloper changed the title Convert tvm latex to web whitepaper v2 feat/fix(whitepaper): rework TVM whitepaper webview based on TVM TeX source Nov 10, 2025
@reveloper reveloper changed the title feat/fix(whitepaper): rework TVM whitepaper webview based on TVM TeX source fix(whitepaper): rework TVM whitepaper webview based on TVM TeX source Nov 10, 2025

### A.7.2. Cell deserialization primitives
The reader might wonder how the values serialized inside a cell may be modified. Suppose a cell contains three serialized 29-bit integers, $(x,y,z)$, represen
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Formatting seems different here.

Screenshot 0007-11-10 at 19 46 04


### A.7.2. Cell deserialization primitives
The reader might wonder how the values serialized inside a cell may be modified. Suppose a cell contains three serialized 29-bit integers, $(x,y,z)$, represen
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Highlighting here doesn't make sense; let's keep this non-highlighted unless we add a TVM instruction highlight.

Screenshot 0007-11-11 at 14 18 33


### A.7.2. Cell deserialization primitives
The reader might wonder how the values serialized inside a cell may be modified. Suppose a cell contains three serialized 29-bit integers, $(x,y,z)$, represen
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Table headers transfered in wrong way
Screenshot 0007-11-11 at 16 18 28


### A.7.2. Cell deserialization primitives
The reader might wonder how the values serialized inside a cell may be modified. Suppose a cell contains three serialized 29-bit integers, $(x,y,z)$, represen
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Table headers transferred miss the original table.
Screenshot 0007-11-11 at 16 23 16

@reveloper
Copy link
Collaborator

@fakela
Please, fix all table headers and drop the highlighting from instruction code blocks. You can find examples of those issues above.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

3p Reviewed by someone else. Used for filtering PRs. Don't mind this.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants