Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add too-many-positional-arguments to ignore list for pylint #214

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Oct 25, 2024

Conversation

FanwangM
Copy link
Collaborator

This fixes the failing test.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Oct 17, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Please upload report for BASE (main@bf2ef76). Learn more about missing BASE report.

Additional details and impacted files

Impacted file tree graph

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #214   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage        ?   94.13%           
=======================================
  Files           ?       11           
  Lines           ?      801           
  Branches        ?        0           
=======================================
  Hits            ?      754           
  Misses          ?       47           
  Partials        ?        0           

Copy link
Member

@PaulWAyers PaulWAyers left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Seems OK to me. Might be good to see if @FarnazH has some thoughts on long lists of positional arguments, but it does seem semi-standard (at least when optional arguments are included) in scientific packages like scipy

@FanwangM
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@FarnazH, do you have any comments or suggestions before I merge it? Thanks.

@FanwangM FanwangM merged commit 6e592be into theochem:main Oct 25, 2024
19 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants