Skip to content

Conversation

@FlorianLB
Copy link
Contributor

Complement to #94 , some brokers were missing the feature.

@FlorianLB
Copy link
Contributor Author

@s3rius any chance you can review it (and make a release) soon ?

we are missing this feature to build a proper priority queue system

@chandr-andr
Copy link
Member

@FlorianLB Hi! I can, s3rius on the vacation now.

Could you please check tests? They failed.

@chandr-andr
Copy link
Member

@FlorianLB, and please add some information about your PR in the repo's README.

@FlorianLB FlorianLB force-pushed the feat-custom-queue-name-per-message branch from 6341cf2 to fe2bfdf Compare October 6, 2025 10:27
@FlorianLB
Copy link
Contributor Author

@chandr-andr I documented the changes.

But tests are failing because of the test pipeline setup, not due to the changes

@chandr-andr
Copy link
Member

@FlorianLB Ok, thanks! I'll make a release now

@chandr-andr chandr-andr merged commit 0ff98e1 into taskiq-python:main Oct 6, 2025
3 of 8 checks passed
@chandr-andr
Copy link
Member

@FlorianLB https://pypi.org/project/taskiq-redis/1.1.1/
You can check it here

@vkozmik
Copy link

vkozmik commented Oct 21, 2025

@FlorianLB could you please explain how to use it for low priority queue? E.g. how to configure a worker to consider that one queue has bigger priority than the other?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants