Skip to content

Auto upgrade bitcode to new vararg representation for coro.id.retcon.once intrinsic #10554

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: stable/20250402
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

t-rasmud
Copy link

@t-rasmud t-rasmud commented Apr 25, 2025

The signature of coro.id.retcon.once intrinsic was modified in #10015 with an extra vararg. This commit adds an auto upgrader to LLVM in order to be compatible with compilers generating old bitcode (intrinsic without the vararg).

rdar://147426562
(cherry picked from commit 969660b)
(cherry picked from commit 2eaa148)
(cherry picked from commit 889ce26)
(cherry picked from commit 031baa1)
(cherry picked from commit 98dd062)

…once intrinsic

The signature of coro.id.retcon.once intrinsic was modified in #10015
with an extra vararg. This commit adds an auto upgrader to LLVM in order to be compatible with compilers
generating old bitcode (intrinsic without the vararg).

rdar://147426562
(cherry picked from commit 969660b)
(cherry picked from commit 2eaa148)
(cherry picked from commit 889ce26)
(cherry picked from commit 031baa1)
(cherry picked from commit 98dd062)
@t-rasmud
Copy link
Author

@swift-ci test

@t-rasmud
Copy link
Author

@swift-ci test llvm

Copy link

@cachemeifyoucan cachemeifyoucan left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM. I think you need to nominate for release/6.2 branch as well. Thanks!

@t-rasmud
Copy link
Author

@swift-ci please test

@t-rasmud
Copy link
Author

@swift-ci test llvm

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants