-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 527
services/horizon: Fix docker-compose Postgres' auth #2301
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
2 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think we should leave this change out and continue to use the latest 9.6 patch version. It's valuable for us to continue to use the latest security patches and to not need to update this manually on each patch release. Normally a patch release won't include breaking changes and this seems like an exception, so the pain of a new version breaking use is unlikely to be frequent.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
As far as I understand this is only used for local development, so I am not sure security is more important than stability but, happy to make the change if you want.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Agreed, but nobody wants their developer environment exploitable.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It's worth noting that this is only pinning to a version of Postgres, not to a version of the Docker image. The version number is the version of Postgres, and the Docker images can change independent of that with any change to the official Dockerfiles.
Specifying the patch version number wouldn't have prevented this breakage from occurring because the breaking change was a change to the Docker image (docker-library/postgres@42ce743), and not Postgres. See this PR for more information that is adding a warning to their docs about this as a result of this break: docker-library/postgres#689.
If we really want to ensure 100% stability this would need to pin to the image digest, but I think this is unnecessary as breaking changes are rare.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Your point doesn't hold, because tags with the patch number are not rebuilt, and thus can be considered immutable for all they are worth
.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Oh nice, TIL. Thanks!