Fix #8: Docker sandbox mounts workspace read-only, breaking test writes - #33
Conversation
…ts can write files
|
Warning Review limit reached
Next review available in: 43 minutes Enable usage-based reviews in Billing to review now. Otherwise, wait until the next included review is available. How can I continue?After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the To avoid repeated limits, reduce automatic review volume by pausing incremental auto-reviews earlier, using label-based review opt-in, excluding WIP or generated PR titles, or requesting reviews manually when the PR is ready. If your team needs uninterrupted high-volume reviews, an organization admin can enable usage-based reviews. How do review limits work?CodeRabbit enforces per-developer PR review limits for each organization. Most developers receive the normal plan review availability. For paid Pro and Pro+ PR reviews, CodeRabbit uses adaptive limits for sustained high-volume activity. When a developer's recent PR review activity reaches the 95th percentile or higher among CodeRabbit users, additional reviews become available more gradually as earlier reviews age out of the rolling window. Please refer docs for additional details. Review details⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: Organization UI Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro Plus Run ID: 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
Closes #8
Problem
modules/sandbox.pyline 253 mounted the workspace as read-only:Any test that writes files during a run — .pyc bytecode, coverage
reports, temp fixtures, log files — would fail inside the Docker
sandbox, even when the test logic itself was correct.
Fix
Changed the mount flag from
:roto:rw, so the container canwrite to the workspace the same way the SubprocessSandbox fallback
already can.
Verified
Ran the mount directly with Docker to confirm the before/after
behavior:
:ro): fails withRead-only file system:rw): succeeds withWRITE_OKNote
This issue was assigned to @sasikumar161106, but had no linked PR or
visible activity, so I picked it up. Happy to close in favor of
theirs if they're already working on it.