Skip to content

Jackson3 based HashMapper and RedisSerializer #3168

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Draft
wants to merge 12 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Draft

Conversation

christophstrobl
Copy link
Member

work in progress...

pom.xml Outdated
<dependency>
<groupId>tools.jackson.core</groupId>
<artifactId>jackson-databind</artifactId>
<version>3.0.0-rc5</version>
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Dependency management available: spring-projects/spring-data-build#2594

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

hm... I see some test failures using that.

Copy link
Member Author

@christophstrobl christophstrobl Jul 3, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

ok, so com.fasterxml.jackson.core:jackson-annotations did, for whatever reason, not transition to tools.jackson. The outcome is as expected a mess, with both the 2.19 as well as the 3.0 BOM pointing to different versions.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

oh, to round things off the verion schema is different, so you need 3.0-rc5 for jackson-annotations. Not 3.0.0-rc5 as for the rest.

@christophstrobl christophstrobl force-pushed the issue/3154 branch 2 times, most recently from b4bd720 to 20329b7 Compare July 2, 2025 10:54
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants