Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

test #1471

Closed
wants to merge 47 commits into from
Closed

test #1471

wants to merge 47 commits into from

Conversation

huqiuxiang
Copy link

@huqiuxiang huqiuxiang commented Feb 10, 2025

Motivation:

Explain the context, and why you're making that change.
To make others understand what is the problem you're trying to solve.

Modification:

Describe the idea and modifications you've done.

Result:

Fixes #.

If there is no issue then describe the changes introduced by this PR.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Updated automation configurations to improve security scanning and compliance checks.
    • Introduced new workflows for FOSSA scanning, code quality analysis, and software composition review.
    • Removed legacy pipelines for build and release processes.
    • Enhanced dependency management with additional libraries supporting XML binding and annotations.
  • Tests
    • Added a new test file to extend quality assurance coverage.

@sofastack-cla sofastack-cla bot added cla:yes CLA is ok First-time contributor First-time contributor size/L labels Feb 10, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Feb 10, 2025

Warning

Rate limit exceeded

@sofastack-cla[bot] has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 26 minutes and 18 seconds before requesting another review.

⌛ How to resolve this issue?

After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit.

🚦 How do rate limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization.

Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout.

Please see our FAQ for further information.

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between be93251 and 87c5d25.

📒 Files selected for processing (10)
  • .github/workflows/cloud_code_scan.yml (2 hunks)
  • .github/workflows/fossa_scan.yml (1 hunks)
  • .github/workflows/maven.yml (0 hunks)
  • .github/workflows/release.yml (0 hunks)
  • .github/workflows/sonarqube_scan.yml (1 hunks)
  • .github/workflows/soos_scan.yml (1 hunks)
  • pom.xml (1 hunks)
  • registry/registry-local/pom.xml (1 hunks)
  • remoting/remoting-triple/pom.xml (1 hunks)
  • test_hqx (1 hunks)

Walkthrough

This pull request updates several GitHub Actions workflows and modifies project dependencies. The codescan workflow now uses a different action reference, and new workflows for FOSSA, SonarQube, and SOOS scans have been added. In contrast, Maven-based build and release workflows have been removed. Additionally, new dependencies have been introduced in various pom.xml files, and an extra test file has been included.

Changes

File(s) Change Summary
.../cloud_code_scan.yml Updated codescan action in both stc and sca jobs from layotto/alipay-cloud-devops-codescan@main to huqiuxiang/alipay-cloud-devops-codescan@main.
.../fossa_scan.yml
.../sonarqube_scan.yml
.../soos_scan.yml
Added new workflows to automate FOSSA scanning, SonarQube analysis, and SOOS SCA, each triggered on branch events.
.../maven.yml
.../release.yml
Removed Maven-based build/test and release workflows.
pom.xml Added dependencies under <dependencyManagement>: javax.xml.bind:jaxb-api:2.3.1 and jakarta.annotation:jakarta.annotation-api:2.0.0 (provided).
registry/.../pom.xml Added dependency: javax.xml.bind:jaxb-api.
remoting/remoting-triple/pom.xml Added dependency: javax.annotation:javax.annotation-api:1.3.2.
test_hqx New test file added.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant Repo as Repository
    participant GH as GitHub Actions
    participant Checkout as Checkout Action
    participant FOSSA as FOSSA Scan Action

    Repo->>GH: Push/PR to master
    GH->>Checkout: Checkout code (actions/checkout@v3)
    Checkout-->>GH: Code ready
    GH->>FOSSA: Execute FOSSA scan (fossa-contrib/fossa-action@v1)
    FOSSA-->>GH: Return scan results
Loading
sequenceDiagram
    participant Repo as Repository
    participant GH as GitHub Actions
    participant Checkout as Checkout Action
    participant SetupJava as Setup Java Action
    participant Maven as Maven

    Repo->>GH: Push to master
    GH->>Checkout: Checkout code (actions/checkout@v2)
    Checkout-->>GH: Code ready
    GH->>SetupJava: Set up JDK 17 (actions/setup-java@v2)
    SetupJava-->>GH: JDK ready
    GH->>Maven: Run Maven build and SonarQube analysis
    Maven-->>GH: Analysis complete
Loading
sequenceDiagram
    participant Repo as Repository
    participant GH as GitHub Actions
    participant Checkout as Checkout Action
    participant SOOS as SOOS SCA Action

    Repo->>GH: Push/PR to master
    GH->>Checkout: Checkout code (actions/checkout@v3)
    Checkout-->>GH: Code ready
    GH->>SOOS: Run SOOS SCA (soos-io/soos-sca-github-action@v2)
    SOOS-->>GH: Return SCA results
Loading

Poem

I'm a bunny hopped up on changes new,
In workflows and scans I’m dancing through.
FOSSA, SonarQube, and SOOS join the fun,
While old builds and releases are quietly done.
Dependencies line up like carrots in a row,
Code trails now bloom wherever I go! 🐇


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@huqiuxiang huqiuxiang closed this Feb 10, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
cla:yes CLA is ok First-time contributor First-time contributor size/L
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant