Test

[huqiuxiang]

Motivation:

Explain the context, and why you're making that change.
To make others understand what is the problem you're trying to solve.

Modification:

Describe the idea and modifications you've done.

Result:

Fixes #.

If there is no issue then describe the changes introduced by this PR.

Summary by CodeRabbit

• New Features
  • Enhanced automation workflows to improve security and code quality scans with updated trigger conditions.
• Chores
  • Removed outdated build and release processes.
  • Refined project structure and dependency management to boost overall stability.
• Tests
  • Introduced an additional test suite to further ensure quality assurance.

[coderabbitai]

Warning

Rate limit exceeded

@sofastack-cla[bot] has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 26 minutes and 3 seconds before requesting another review.

⌛ How to resolve this issue?

After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit.

🚦 How do rate limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization.

Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout.

Please see our FAQ for further information.

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between be93251 and 68a61c8.

📒 Files selected for processing (10)

• .github/workflows/cloud_code_scan.yml (1 hunks)
• .github/workflows/fossa_scan.yml (1 hunks)
• .github/workflows/maven.yml (0 hunks)
• .github/workflows/release.yml (0 hunks)
• .github/workflows/sonarqube_scan.yml (1 hunks)
• .github/workflows/soos_scan.yml (1 hunks)
• pom.xml (2 hunks)
• registry/registry-local/pom.xml (1 hunks)
• remoting/remoting-triple/pom.xml (1 hunks)
• test_hqx (1 hunks)

Walkthrough

The pull request updates several GitHub Actions workflows and project configurations. The cloud code scan workflow now triggers on push and pull request events restricted to the master branch. New workflows for FOSSA, SonarQube, and SOOS scans have been added, while the Maven build and release workflows were removed. In addition, the pom.xml files have been enhanced with extra dependencies and a modules section, and a new test file has been introduced.

Changes

File(s)	Change Summary
.github/workflows/cloud_code_scan.yml	Updated trigger events: replaced pull_request_target with push and pull_request events (master branch only); previous trigger remains as a commented-out line.
.github/workflows/{fossa_scan.yml, sonarqube_scan.yml, soos_scan.yml}	Added new workflows for FOSSA, SonarQube, and SOOS scanning. Each is configured to trigger on push/pull_request events to the master branch and runs a dedicated scan job on Ubuntu.
.github/workflows/{maven.yml, release.yml}	Removed workflows that automated Maven builds and releases for the project.
pom.xml	Added dependencyManagement entries for jaxb-api and jakarta.annotation-api, and introduced a new modules section listing multiple project modules.
registry/.../pom.xml	Added a new dependency for javax.xml.bind: jaxb-api.
remoting/.../pom.xml	Added a new dependency for javax.annotation: javax.annotation-api (version 1.3.2).
test_hqx	Added a new test file for testing purposes.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    actor Developer
    participant GitHub Actions as GitHub
    participant CloudScan as Cloud Code Scan
    participant FOSSA as FOSSA Scan
    participant Sonar as SonarQube Scan
    participant SOOS as SOOS Scan

    Developer->>GitHub: Push commit/PR to master
    GitHub->>CloudScan: Trigger Cloud Code Scan Workflow
    GitHub->>FOSSA: Trigger FOSSA Scan Workflow
    GitHub->>Sonar: Trigger SonarQube Scan Workflow
    GitHub->>SOOS: Trigger SOOS Scan Workflow
    par Workflows Execution
      CloudScan->>GitHub: Return scan results
      FOSSA->>GitHub: Return scan results
      Sonar->>GitHub: Return analysis report
      SOOS->>GitHub: Return SARIF output
    end

Loading

Suggested reviewers

• EvenLjj
• z2z23n0

Poem

I'm a little rabbit, hopping through code,
CI workflows now lighten my joyful load.
Scans run on push and PR with flair,
New dependencies and tests are in the air.
With binkies and bytes, I dance with delight—
Celebrating these changes from morning till night!

---

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

• Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
  • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
  • Generate unit testing code for this file.
  • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
• Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
  • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
• PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
  • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
  • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
  • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

• @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
• @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
• @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
• @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
• @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
• @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
• @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
• @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
• @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

• Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
• Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
• Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

• You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
• Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
• If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

• Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
• Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
• Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.