-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 100
Commit
This commit does not belong to any branch on this repository, and may belong to a fork outside of the repository.
- Loading branch information
Showing
2 changed files
with
20 additions
and
1 deletion.
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
|
@@ -4,4 +4,4 @@ | |
Adding imports here will break setup.py | ||
""" | ||
|
||
__version__ = '1.0.0' | ||
__version__ = '1.1.0' |
6350a3d
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Would
Don't allow the audience claim to be ignored. Preventing access token reuse
make so that API requests need an entirely new access token for each request?Otherwise I like the login-screen change, good stuff!
6350a3d
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
No, by reuse I meant using an access token meant for a different "resource server". Now that there's DRF support and the backend doesn't fetch the access token itself, there's potential in abusing this setting.
6350a3d
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I see, thanks for clarification.