-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 25
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Need for even deeper hierarchy level #309
Comments
Thanks for the request, @LasseMempel. This is similar to #156 where we already added support for additional hierarchies. |
Hey @LasseMempel , limitless is difficult due to the fact that graphql does not support recursion. But two more levels should be no problem. @acka47 so should we just add two more levels? Maybe at some point in the future we can think about restructuring the graphql queries to allow limitless levels |
Two more levels would be a nice start ;) |
+1 |
@LasseMempel sorry for the delay. I was on parental leave and did not open my laptop too much. I added two more levels on branch https://github.com/skohub-io/skohub-vocabs/tree/309-deeper-hierarchy and opened #311 |
No worries, I'm glad to hear you're investing in your family! |
The thesaurus I am working with has two deeper hierarchy levels than currently supported.
Any chance there is space for these? Or to avoid future issues of the same type a limitless (to a certain degree) nesting support?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: