Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

2 Commits

Folders and files

NameName
Last commit message
Last commit date
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Repository files navigation

CaP-X Leaderboard

A small, self-contained leaderboard for code-as-policy agents on the CaP-X manipulation benchmark. All data lives in one CSV; index.html reads it at runtime, so updating the leaderboard is just editing a CSV — no build step.

.
├── index.html    # the page (fetches + renders summary.csv)
└── summary.csv   # all teams' scores (one row per team per simulation)

Viewing it

Browsers block fetch() of local files over file://, so serve the folder over HTTP:

python -m http.server 8000
# then open http://localhost:8000

(Any static host works too — e.g. GitHub Pages serves it directly.)

Metrics

Two simulators (robosuite, libero), two metrics each:

Metric Meaning Direction
success_rate Task-success rate — share of trials that complete the task (task_completed / reward == 1.0), as a percent 0–100 higher is better
inference_speed Average wall-clock seconds per trial lower is faster

The Overall column is the mean of the two simulators' success rates and drives the default ranking (medals). Click any column header to re-sort.

CSV schema

summary.csv is "long" format — one row per team per simulation (each team has exactly two rows: robosuite and libero):

team,category,model,simulation,success_rate,inference_speed
Gemini 3 Pro,paper-closed,google/gemini-3.1-pro-preview,robosuite,88.5,14.7
Gemini 3 Pro,paper-closed,google/gemini-3.1-pro-preview,libero,67.0,16.2
Qwen3-Coder,paper-open,Qwen/Qwen3-Coder (best OSS),robosuite,74.0,9.8
Qwen3-Coder,paper-open,Qwen/Qwen3-Coder (best OSS),libero,52.5,11.0
Column Notes
team Display name (repeated on both rows).
category One of paper-closed, paper-open, baseline, community — sets the badge.
model Optional subtitle under the team name (leave empty for none).
simulation robosuite or libero.
success_rate Percent, 0–100.
inference_speed Seconds per trial.

Updating

  • Change a score: edit the number in summary.csv, refresh the page.
  • Add a team: append its two rows (robosuite + libero, schema above) to summary.csv.
  • Add a simulator later: add a row per team and extend the columns/labels in index.html (COLUMNS + the <thead> group headers + aggregateTeam).

Hosting (GitHub Pages)

The site is plain static files with no build step, so any static host works. It's wired for GitHub Pages via .github/workflows/deploy.yml, which publishes the repo root as the site root on every push to main.

Go live (one time). Free GitHub Pages needs a public repo:

  1. Make the repo public (Settings → General → Change visibility). This exposes the whole repo and its history — confirm nothing sensitive is in there first.
  2. Settings → Pages → Source → GitHub Actions.
  3. Push to main (or Actions → Deploy leaderboard to PagesRun workflow) to trigger the first deploy.
  4. Live at https://<user>.github.io/<repo>/ — for this repo, https://shuperposition.github.io/web/.

Weekly update (~1 min). Once live, drop the new weekly summary.csv in place, then:

git add summary.csv
git commit -m "leaderboard: <week>"
git push          # the workflow redeploys automatically; live in ~1 min

Data provenance ⚠️

These numbers are illustrative, not official results:

  • Paper teams (Gemini 3 Pro, Qwen3-Coder) are marked (est.) in the UI. The CaP-X paper's result tables are not bundled in this repo, so their scores are estimates grounded in the repo's real anchors (the robosuite regression rewards in docs/development.md; LIBERO being empirically much harder than robosuite in actual outputs/ runs). Replace them with the paper's real numbers when available.
  • Community teams are entirely mock submissions for demonstration.

Releases

Packages

Contributors

Languages