Skip to content

Scales reward for completing additional lode scans of a drill#6362

Open
zimon9 wants to merge 1 commit into
shiptest-ss13:masterfrom
zimon9:drill-mission-additional-lodes
Open

Scales reward for completing additional lode scans of a drill#6362
zimon9 wants to merge 1 commit into
shiptest-ss13:masterfrom
zimon9:drill-mission-additional-lodes

Conversation

@zimon9
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@zimon9 zimon9 commented Jun 3, 2026

About The Pull Request

This PR makes it so that instead of any additional lode being equal to 200 credits, it scales by a factor of the drill mission class. Class 2 drills net 400 credits per additional lode, and class 3 drills net 600 credits.

Why It's Good For The Game

This change should make it more worthwhile to do extra scans on higher-tiered drills. As it is now, obtaining additional lodes becomes less and less worth doing the higher the class of drill you're doing, and this change should address that.

Changelog

🆑
balance: scales additional lode redemption based on drill class
/:cl:

@zimon9 zimon9 requested a review from FalloutFalcon as a code owner June 3, 2026 22:23
@github-actions github-actions Bot added the Code change Watch something violently break. label Jun 3, 2026
@Erikafox
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Erikafox commented Jun 5, 2026

I would be okay with even more bonus per node if it capped out at fixed amount of the mission's worth for additional payout (say 15%?)

@zimon9
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

zimon9 commented Jun 5, 2026

I would be okay with even more bonus per node if it capped out at fixed amount of the mission's worth for additional payout (say 15%?)

oh- yes that's a good idea
I'll cap it but I'll keep the reward bonus the same (it's really high as it is, I think? I'll change it as you deem would be best)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Code change Watch something violently break.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants